Archive for September, 2010

Professionalization of the Social Media Industry

Tuesday, September 28th, 2010

It’s interesting to look back over the last few years as it relates to social media in the enterprise.  Just consider the corporate process of buy in around social.  Initially, employees, detractors or zealots were jumping into social on behalf of the company.  Kicking and screaming, companies started to dip their own toe in the water by testing and piloting blogs, forums, communities, etc.  Recently, I have noticed companies beginning to get serious about social media.  One way to tell, look at the positions they are hiring for here and here.

Hiring a few of these positions myself, I am wondering what companies are looking for in candidates.  Social is a strange bird as no one company created it and no one technology runs it.  Therefore there are no processes, textbooks, online courses, etc that cover all the skills a “social” leader needs to have in order to be effective.  In fact, social media has become such a bucket term that anything that smells like an online interaction gets the label.  That includes search, CRM, community mgr, web architect, public relations (blogger), recruiting (HR) and others.  Companies can hire any of these positions with some proficiency.  Add the word “social” in front of it and it sends shivers of consternation through hiring managers.  Those managers don’t know how to differentiate a blogging skillset which is more journalistic in nature from a digital strategist from a community manager (think traffic cop).  To make sure you are getting the right person for the job, What keywords do you use to search? what questions do you interview with? what skills do you test for?

Companies are tentative now as they have gone after social skills that understood how to set up a blog but did not know how large corporations run in complex environments.  They understand how to get small groups of people interested in having online conversations but they don’t understand the pshychology or cultural elements that go into consumer marketing.  The other side is to take existing employees and train them to be social.  This helps align the needs of the business and the intricacies of getting things done but assumes a ramp up time to come up-to-speed on becoming social.

This approach to professionalizing your social efforts assumes that it is a personnel issue.  I’m not exactly sold on that either.  Socialmedia has effectively transformed the way we communicate in many ways, it did not invent it.  Companies who have never wanted to communicate with partners or customers before, simply don’t have the culture to do it today, whether they have a staffer who can blog or not.  So it becomes an organizational design issue not a staffing issue.  Companies who are set up in silos or independent operating groups or P&L’s are simply not designed to communicate across department whether you have the latest version of Jive or SharePoint or not.  There is something more fundamental to becoming a social business than a couple of trained people or a few new toys.

Another interesting point of view on this topic can be found here: http://healthissocial.com/process-improvement/professional-development-in-the-age-of-social-media/ ( a solid post by Phil Baumann)

So what is the best way to professionalize your company’s approach to social media?  How do you take it to the next level?  This week’s chat will take this discussion head on!  To facilitate the dialogue we have Chris Heuer, a proven innovator who has been able to re-invent himself many times over.  Chris is best known recently for co-founding the Social Media Club that has become the connecting point for the professionals in the social media industry.  there is no one better to help figure out how to professionalize the social media efforts of businesses.  This week’s topic and questions are:

Topic: Professionalization of the Social Media Industry

Q1: How do you determine a professional from a wanna be?

Q2: Does the bucket term “Social” need to be broken into specialties?

Q3: What pieces of social can you learn from books? From experience?

Join us this week 9/28/10 at noon eastern by following #sm79 from your favorite Twitter client or simply participate from our LIVE page at www.hashtagsocialmedia.com/live.

Does Pharma REALLY have anything to offer in social networking?

Tuesday, September 21st, 2010

Social media and social networks provide an increasingly popular way for consumer and companies to engage and interact. Consumers are not bound by regulations in the way they communicate. They are free to discuss their healthcare issues with anyone they want. Whether sharing advice on medications and their off-label uses or talking about a weird thing that happened to them medically and “oh-by-the-way” I was taking this medication when it started happening, consumers are free to share this information when and how they want.

For pharmaceutical and insurance companies, these same conversations can cause severe cases of heartburn for regulatory and compliance departments if these topics were to be brought up on a social networking site sponsored by said company. Off-label uses cannot be condoned by the pharma company and allowing a C2C conversation to happen without correcting it may be considered condoning it if brought into legal proceedings. The “oh-by-the-way” discussion could be considered an Adverse Event (AE) and would therefore need to be registered into an AE database that is regulated by the FDA.

As you can see these relatively benign instances that happen all over Facebook, Twitter and other social networks every day fall directly into a regulatory grey area for pharmaceutical and insurance companies. Without direct legislation and regulation, many companies have chosen to stay away from social media for the time being. The problem is that social media is not going away and that social engagement could pave a potentially lucrative path to new revenues and new opportunities for those companies who can figure out how to harness the power of social.

Understanding what regulations are in place and applying them to social we help shape a foundation by which to develop better guidelines for participation in social media and social networks.

Be Clear in Conversations
The range and depth of biotech, pharma and health care regulations are vast. They cover a wide range of areas spanning how you manage clinical trials to manufacturing to sales and control of patient information. While discussing the talking points in this document let’s be clear that our assumptions are that:
     * You are using your social network to manage outreach to bring interested parties into the fold to inform them of where to get information, gather their ideas, priorities and interests, and connect them with other professionals with related interests and expertise. This might include:
          o Foster greater collaboration on new products
          o Improve internal processes
          o Increase the effectiveness and efficiency managing regulatory compliance
          o Enable doctors and patients to more easily access needed information
          o Increasing the efficiency in the delivery of health care through innovation and collaboration
          o Strengthen post-marketing pharmacovigilance their products

     * You are not using your social network to manage clinical trial subject data; drug, biologic or medical device manufacturing data; or safety data

What are the Regulations that Need to Be Considered?

     The two primary bodies of regulation to watch are:
1. Title 21 CFR Part 11 - Title 21, Part 11 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) which deals with the FDA guidelines on electronic records and electronic signatures
2. HIPAA Title IIHealth Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) protects the ability for workers and their families to gain access to health care when the switch employers or jurisdictions (i.e., when they move). Title II of HIPPA contains something called The Privacy Rule that governs the use and disclosure of Protected Health Information (PHI).

The other area to understand is how to manage Adverse Events which falls under the term Pharmacovigilance.
1. Pharmacovigilance: Generally speaking, pharmacovigilance is the science of collecting, monitoring, researching, assessing and evaluating information from healthcare providers and patients on the adverse effects of medications, biological products, herbalism and traditional medicines

     How to Incorporate These Regulations into Social
The following talking points are meant to address how we can meet regulatory guidelines by implementing technology in very particular ways to mitigate regulatory concerns and still engage stakeholders in a meaningful way.

First, there are two over-riding recommendations when incorporating social media. They are:
1. Separate social networking infrastructure from regulated legacy systems. You do not want to unduly subject your social networking infrastructure to all of the regulations that fall under regulated systems therefore it is absolutely critical to ensure you separate the social networking components of your Health 2.0 infrastructure from your other enterprise systems.
2. House all UGC in a true enterprise data warehouse. By pulling social networking UGC into a enterprise data warehouse and providing your safety monitoring team access to this, you are providing them a new channel to mine and monitor safety information.

With regard to specific regulations, here is how they can be incorporated into social media:

Title 21, Part 11 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) that deals with FDA guidelines on electronic records and signatures. With social engagement, we recommend three key elements:
1. Never Delete: data needs to be Archived or turned “Inactive” not deleted.
2. Use secure, electronic signatures: which relates to only letting authenticated users contribute content (no anonymous contributions).
3. Documentation of Compliance: be able to demonstrate that you have designed, built and tested a system that does the above. This includes documenting requirements, design, test cases and successful completion of those test cases. It also includes demonstration that your configuration management processes ensure that the code you have in production has completed full documentation of the above before going to production.

HIPAA Title II: specifically the Privacy Rule that governs the use and disclosure of Protected Health Information (PHI). We recommend three key elements:
1. Closed Groups – create specific areas that can be closed from general populations (ie.HIV, Diabetes, etc groups). To create even tighter requirements you can apply white list/black list rules to enforce group requirements (even blacklisting insurance domains).
2. Strict Adherence to Profile Information – Do not capture any PHI data fields. Strongly encourage Display Names to not include names or other identifiers (this includes either prohibiting Avatars or only allowing members to pick from a list generic Avatar icons). Finally, encrypt all profile information (and – to assure Part 11 compliance – never delete past profile information.)
3. Moderate all UGC – this is limiting in participation and taxing on resources however there is a mix of moderation and publication that can limit a user’s exposure (through the use of coordinate inputs for instance).
Pharmacovigilance: pertains to patients reporting adverse drug effects. There are a couple of items here including moderation and having a true data warehouse to store your social content and easily mine and manage information and content.

Source: Much of this content was pulled or modified from http://www.exsecutus.com/haughwout/2009/07/health20-ugc-mgmt which is the work of Jim Haughwout.

So now we’ve covered the regulatory side of the issues that pharma faces in social.  So what can they do?  That is what our moderator this week is going to help us figure out.  Moderating this week is Steve Woodruff.  Steve is one of the leading minds in helping to figure out social in regulated industries.  The topic this week and the questions are:

Topic:  Does Pharma REALLY have anything to offer in social networking?

Q1:  I think pharma companies are generally evil and I don’t want to hear from them. Am I right?

Q2:  I have health questions and would really like to hear from these companies. Can they talk?

Q3:  What are pharma companies actually doing in the social space, and is it worth anything?

Join us on Tuesday 9/21 at noon ET for the #socialmedia chat by following #sm78 from your favorite Twitter client or simply follow our LIVE site at www.hashtagsocialmedia.com/live.

Living on Borrowed Time? The Ad Agency Model is Changing

Monday, September 13th, 2010

If you have ever watched Mad Men, it is interesting to explore how agencies used to work….last week.  The cable series,  Mad Men, is suppposed to depict a time when the free-wheeling agencies on Madison Ave influenced what people bought and how they were supposed to think about products.  The interesting thing about the agencies depicted by Mad Men is they still operate much the same today as they did 50-60 years ago, what has changed though, is their decreasing ability to influence consumers.  Why are agencies stuggling to stay relevant with a model that has worked for so long?

          Business is becoming more about customer relationships rather than transactions.

Social media has changed the expectation of the consumer.  The digital landscape has created more opportunities and more challenges than at any time in the history of advertising.  Advertising agencies have been slow to react not because they are slow, they just don’t know what the new model should look like.  Attempting to bridge the gap:

  • Traditional agencies are trying to deploy technologies. 
  • Digital agencies are trying to  manage brands
  • Brands are trying to hire managers to oversee commerce, digital, social, technology, etc
  • Technology firms are trying to dis-intermediate the agency by going direct to the Brands
  • The world has been in one of the most challenging economic times since the 1930′s.

All of this together and the fact that agencies are pitching against very different competitive bidders to win new business and fighting to stay relevant when they actually do get a piece of business.  The world of advertising continues to become more complex.  There used to be a handful of consumer touchpoints from radio to 5 channels on television, now there’s millions of digital and hundreds of television touchpoints.  If this was all that had changed, the old agency models might still be working with expertise divided into practice units (brand design, direct, PR, events, promotions, multicultural and now digital).  Not only have the amount of touchpoints dramatically increased, the expectations of the client and the consumer have also dramatically changed.

  • New Client Demands: Integration & Accountability – companies are competing in a truly global economy.  Even smaller firms are able to compete across the globe thanks to digital.  In order to do this effectively, marketing cannot continue to be a siloed department.  Campaigns must integrate with CRM, commerce, logistics systems (shipping) and service to provide the level of experience and services that consumers now expect.  Marketers are also coming under more scrutiny to deliver results not just campaigns.  The have one of the largest cost centers and CEOs are demanding to see an impact on business.
  • New Consumer Demands: Engagement over the long term – Marketing is no longer a series of campaigns, it’s a commitment to the customer.  It is no longer OK for companies to run 15 campaigns across 12 brands using 7 different agencies in an un-coordinated and inconsistent manner.  Consumers love to buy, but hate being sold to.  Marketers cannot push message after message without a way to develop relationships with key customers.  Understanding that EVERY consumer touchpoint is an opportunity to over-deliver on the company experience, systems must be integrated from the ad on the web, to the message on the website, to the box that comes in the mail, to the person on the phone/chat in customer service….over the next 16 years.

Now I don’t know what the right model looks like.  Agencies like Crispin, Porter + Bogusky are helping us re-imagine the digital possibilities through experience innovation and agencies like R/GA are re-defining what the make-up of an agency should be (adding technology, SEO, social expertise along with traditional).  Even these front-runners are not integrated throughout the client nor do they look beyond the campaign overall.

For this week’s event we needed to find an innovator.  Someone who has been in the industry long enough to identify with the sacred cows and someone radical enough to help re-think them.  Hank Wasiak certainly fits the bill!  Hank has proven himself over and over again at the agency level, client level, creative and innovation.  This highly sought after industry revitalist is a must see wherever he goes.  To help us this week we decided on the following topic and subsequent questions:

Living on Borrowed Time? The Ad Agency Model is Changing

Q1: What do Brands expect from agencies today & are they delivering

Q2: How has social media altered the creative process and deployment of  marketing communications programs?

Q3: What does the agency of the future look like?

This week’s event will take place Tuesday 9/14 at noon ET as always.  To join in simply use the keyword #sm77 using your favorite Twitter client or go to out LIVE page at www.hashtagsocialmedia.com/live.

Social CRM and the Value to Organizations

Tuesday, September 7th, 2010

News Alert: Customers are beginning to use social networks to communicate between themselves and with you.  The conversations are happening with or without you.  Whatever you want your brand to be known as or the language you want to be associated to your brand is no longer up to you.

How do companies deal with this?  When the customer’s voice, in many cases, is louder than your own and when customer issues are put to public trial before you even know you’ve been charged with anything.  Let’s call this defense (yes I’m excited that America’s favorite past-time has started this weekend).  What about offense? 

     1.  Now you can begin to understand who might be in the market for your product. 

     2.  You might know when a customer is having issues with their product before they come to you (assuming they give you a chance to fix it). 

     3.  Can you fix a produt flaw as customers begin to first talk about it

 There are many other ways to take advantage of customers talking in online venues (see attached diagram from Altimeter Group’s research on SCRM released in March).  Everyone from the industry can tell you that Social Customer Relationship Management (SCRM) will help companies figure all this out.   The interesting part (as Jacob Morgan points out) is that companies don’t know to ask for a SCRM solution.  In fact, even if you could buy a SCRM solution if probably would not matter all that much.  SCRM is about much more than some piece of technology implementation.  The keys to being effective with your CRM, whether social or not, lie in a company’s ability to capitalize on information as they get it.  To be able to course correct in the midst of a product launch when it was not in the plans.  That seems to be what SCRM is about.  It’s the ability for companies to adapt to their customers rather than adapting to their internal technology paths.  It’s the ability to re-think how data is captured, stored and analyzed to produce better information than what your overpriced sales dudes can provide for you.

These are the opportunities that SCRM make available for companies.  Much like “getting a website” was to marketing in the mid 90′s, SCRM is a virtually untapped opportunity to differntiate your company…in your customer’s eyes.  So we know the value that SCRM can bring, now what are you supposed to do?  Unfortunately, there is not one answer that fits every situation.  There are some guidelines to follow and there are even enough examples out there to begin to model successful efforts if you are able to find them.   To help develop some better models and open us up to some expanded thinking on the topic is one of Altimeter Group’s famous business analysts/strategists, R “Ray” Wang.  Ray brings well earned, highly respected insight to this discusssion on creating value in organizations through Social CRM.  The title and questions are as follows: 

Topic:  SCRM and the Value to Organizations

Q1: What are the basic tenents of SCRM?

Q2: How can you begin to tie social into existing CRM?

Q3: Build a list of useful SCRM use cases. 

This week’s event will take place Tuesday 9/7 at noon eastern.  To participate simply follow #sm76 from any Twitter client or follow along from our LIVE page at www.hashtagsocialmedia.com