Posts Tagged ‘Business’

Social Media’s Impact on Business (and ROI)

Monday, November 9th, 2009

gas_powered_blenderFeeling like stirring the pot a bit this week so we thought a discussion on ROI should do it.

ROI certainly can stir the pot.  But, saying that most of everyone’s conversations on this topic are not actually ROI, rather Impact on Business (IOB), takes the act of stirring and turns it into a blender.  Ahh, much better!

So let’s start by saying that just because it’s “social” does not mean it should be held up to standards typically defined by financial returns whether in business, government or non-profits.  Someone can start a blog or join twitter simply to better understand the tools or to connect with associates they just met at a conference.  This becomes truly social and may at some point have an impact on your business whether financially or some other measure but does not need to be tied into sales goals just because an employee wants to post office pictures so other offices can see how they decorated for the holiday party.  That’s a beginners first step into social computing but not what we are interested for this discussion.

What we are looking for here is to better define and understand what we sometimes mean when we refer to ROI as a verb instead of referring to ROI as a financial metric.  The real definition of Return on Investment (ROI) is: gain from investment minus cost of investment, then divided by cost of investment.  Business books are written, classes are taught, and undergrad studies are derived from this very straightforward metric.  When I talk about ROI, I try to dumb it down a bit into either: 1) increase revenues, 2) decrease costs, or 3) increase in shareholder value and that assumes a financial investment of course.  So why then, does the term ROI get thrown around so much in the context of social media when no financial gain or costs saved are referenced?

Impact on Business (IOB) is the actual term that should be used when discussing things like: # of followers, brand awareness, mentions, impact, conversations and what ever else you can think of that is not related to a financial calculation.  The impact of an employee being nice on twitter is great.  The fact that the customer decides to continue service (Retention) as an indirect effect does not make the time that employee spent on Twitter an actual case for ROI.  It is however, IOB. Olivier Blanchard actually was the first that I know of to begin this discussion a few months ago here.  Companies all over are using social media to have an impact on their business like Kodak measuring Smiles or any company promoting their Facebook fan page.

Many industries discuss IOB like fast food, IT, or big box retailing and it affects every company’s business in some way or another.   You can even consider different departments of a company and the impact of HR, Payroll, PR, Sustainability, Operations play in a company.  Although often not connected directly to revenue, a company would have a difficult time without those departments.  Impact is easier to measure if you don’t have to tie it back somehow to ROI and ROI is much easier to measure if you don’t try to include calculations of impact.  To lead our discussion this week is Jacob Morgan, a principal at Chess Media Group, who focuses on Social Media ROI.  Jacob is well versed in this type of discussion and brings a lot of expertise to the table.  The questions will attempt to progress the discussion from ROI as a catch all phrase to the differences between Impact and ROI for businesses and how to align them.  They are:

1.  Whether Impact or ROI, what “Investments” could be measured to prove out value in Social Media?

2.   How can you prove value from Impact or ROI to executives to continue or try Social Media?

3.  What are some examples of businesses attaining true ROI from Social Media?

Plan on joining in this discussion Tuesday 11/10 at noon EST.  To join either follow #sm33 on Twitter or follow our LIVE site.

The Value of Twitter for Businesses

Tuesday, November 3rd, 2009

rainbowFrom its beginnings in 2006, Twitter has come light years in some ways, yet the service is vitually the same as was when it started.  The same can be said for users who saw 2009 as the year Ashton’s users surpassed 1,000,000, but to what avail?  And businesses are trying to market, service, sell, and befriend anyone who wants to engage albeit mostly as simply just another channel for companies.  So with all of this activity, news and chatter about Twitter, where’s the beef?  As still a very new service in a new vertical and still a new age of communications for everyone, we are still trying re-imagine a life with Twitter and other new means of engaging in personal and business communications.

Don’t get me wrong, there are plenty of interesting uses of Twitter that are changing many facets of life including political upheaval (Iran‘s Protests), grassroots organizing (tweetups, Obama campaign), breaking news (USAirways flight 1549), and more.  While there are some innovative uses of Twitter in business including the usuals: Comcast Cares, Dell, Starbucks and Zappos this is certainly not the norm and, I would argue, most examples of innovative uses of Twitter are more lip service than measurable ROI (I measure ROI with either increased revenue, decreased costs or increased equity).

So with all the chatter, where is the real value of Twitter for Business?  That’s a great question and one that only a real professional could handle for this chat.  So we’ve enlisted the help of the Social Media ExplorerJason Falls.   This is the first time in 32 weeks that we have had a repeat moderator and Jason is certainly worth getting back.  His no-nonsense approach to social media marketing and useage for businesses has earning him a premier class reputation in the industry.  The chat will cover the following:

The Value of Twitter

  1. Why Twitter is important for business today?
  2. What has Twitter influenced to date?
  3. Where does Twitter go from here?

As usual, the chat using Twitter of course, will take place Tuesday 11/3 at 12 noon EST as usual.  This week is seeing a number of firsts.  We realize the #socialmedia has gotten very popular recently and it is sometimes hard to follow along through all the noise.  We have figured out how to maintain the integrity of the chat and record a different hashtag(#).  So this week we are oging to still promote via #socialmedia, however the actual chat will use #SM32 which equals how many moderated chats we have organized.  So be sure to use #SM32 at noon to follow along and participate in the chat.

Social CRM – Lipstick on CRM or Transformational Business Model?

Sunday, October 11th, 2009

We spend a lot of time on this chat discussing social media and marketing with details like implementing, measuring, strategizing, executing,lipstick engaging, etc.  Let’s say we dial it in and our community efforts are going great and growing quickly.  I say, SO WHAT!  If you’re not converting these prospects and customers to do something then who cares.  All this social stuff doesn’t matter if you don’t sell more stuff or keep existing customers on board longer by providing better service.  Another way to look at it is turning regular customers into advocates and detractors into believers.  This happens when you engage the customer quickly, meet expectations, deliver quality and consistency over time in an open and transparent way.  Companies manage these interactions today using internal tracking systems like Customer Relationship Management (CRM).  But wait, customers are not using old ways to communicate, they are using new ways to engage and interact with social tools.  this leaves companies scrambling to figure out how to engage and interact from their internal legacy systems.  Along comes Social CRM.

Everyone is trying to define Social CRM (great resource from Bob Thompson) in their own way and yet no one definition quite fits all needs yet.  One definition by Paul Greenberg makes a lot more sense than many others I’ve seen.  He says:

CRM is a philosophy & a business strategy, supported by a technology platform, business rules, workflow, processes & social characteristics, designed to engage the customer in a collaborative conversation in order to provide mutually beneficial value in a trusted & transparent business environment. It’s the company’s response to the customer’s ownership of the conversation.

But we are not here to define it, our intent is to educate a new legion of corporate soldiers - hell bent on infusing their companies with social goodness both externally and internally.  So what does Social CRM look like?  Here’s a possibility:

  • Traditional CRM: (sales) prospects become leads, leads become accounts and from accounts come opportunities.  Sales people are managed with activity levels (# of calls, emails), funnels are staged and it becomes more operationally focused (read: process focused not customer focused)
  • Social CRM: in an online home improvement Q&A, a homeowner asks “what goes better on a kitchen floor, wood, carpet or tile?” A professional from a home improvement big box store responds with “Tile, because wood might warp with water spills and carpet will hide food that drops.  I am going to forward you a direct line to our local store and a 15% coupon on flooring tile.  Come in this weekend and I’ll make sure Joe is available to walk you through the options in person.”  CRM is updated, Joe at store is notified and homeowner is sent an email with a “Tweet This” link on your experience.  The new measurement might be interactions started, prospects referred and  conversational intent.

A couple of things are happening here.  1) Sales forces must change the “50 calls/day = 10 meetings /week =1 sale/month” sales by the numbers approach to an approach that engages with prospects and their needs and over-delivers with solutions that are relevant at the time.  2) Systems must be able to support this distributed engagement and broaden the ownership roles across many levels of a customer taking what is traditionally an inside-out approach and integrating more of an outside-in model.

To  help us make sense of this all, we’ve invited Aaron Strout to help us moderate the topic this week.  Aaron is a proven professional in this space working from both the vendor and customer side, and is a social heavyweight for sure.  We’ll need a heavywieght as we explore this relatively new topic of Social CRM and begin to identify places to consider implementing within our collective companies.   The chat will consist of 3 questions as usual coming 20 minutes apart and starting at 12 noon EST.  Join in by following #socialmedia through Twitter or to make it easier follow our LIVE page during the event.  The topic:

Social CRM – Lipstick on CRM or Transformational Business Model?

Q1: How does adding social make CRM better?

Q2:  If social is front end & CRM is back end, what information is important to capture into CRM?

Q3:  How can Social CRM help improve conversion (cover sales, service, support)?

Determining the Tipping Point in Social Media

Monday, August 17th, 2009

tipping_point EggThe boss yells in one day that your company needs to “do” social media and would like you to lead the effort, and by the way, can we be up by the end of the day!  Ha, Ha, Right?!?  So you go about securing a Twitter account, setting up Facebook fan page and sneaking in a cute WordPress site on the tail end of your corporate website. 

There, all done!  Then you find out why…the company is announcing an amazing breakthrough product that will change the way people live forever!  Phone banks start lighting up, twitter breaks, you get 1,000,000,000 new fans on Facebook and nothing at this point is manageable.  Now What?

This is a common fear for businesses who are unfamiliar with this whole social thing.  The  “What happens if this actually works?” question. 

This is a question that we often get around developing social strategy for businesses.  Many companies still are trying to get their arms around being social and what it means.  Should their goal be trying to get 30k followers or fans?  Should it be to have 40 “conversations” per day? What if every cusotmer actually uses social and expects an immediate response?  These are all the relevant things that go through executives minds before they sign off on a social initiative. 

So what’s the answer?  The answer in most cases must tie back to strategy and be focused by department.  Your social solution must solve problems for the company not create more.  That’s where our moderator this week takes over.  Connie Reece is beloved by everyone and with her success at New Media Lab, she certainly has the experience to guide companies through the social media maze.  Connie will lead the discussion this week on Tuesday 8/18 at Noon EST.  The questions will be as follows:

Determining the Tipping point in Social Media.

Q1: Can a company have too many friends in SocMed?

Q2: When does quality trump quantity?

Q3: What are the most effective ways of scaling social for Business?

Remember: to participate simply goto the LIVE Page and follow along and post your ideas.  This is an interactive forum using collective experiences.

Should Businesses use Social Networks or Communities…What's the difference & Why should I care?

Monday, July 20th, 2009

First off – I want to acknowledge that we understand using a social network or a community is a tool approach and not a strategic approach to developing a complete internal social media strategy.What's the Difference?

With that said, suppose you are wanting to experiment and don’t have a huge budget, if any.  Say you have to prove out the medium before you can have access to real budget dollars. 

This week’s topic is a little granular but still very important.  Companies are eager to jump in and try out social tactics but often stop short of actually funding a project.  When employees at a tactical level “try out” new marketing approaches they are mostly one-off and not tied into a particular strategy whether at a campaign or a corporate level.  With little amount of thought tied to the actions, it’s no surprise that when the boss asks what the benefit was…the project usually ends there.  So what’s a person to do?  Well, for one thing – MAKE IT COUNT!

If anyone can make it count, it is this week’s moderator Rachel Happe.  From her vast experience in corporate product management to a highly touted analyst, she operates from a position of true hands-on-knowledge that is difficult to match.  This is why her insights are a perfect fit in helping companies determine not only why to participate but how to derive value from the experience. 

There are a lot of ways you could take this conversation and we still find that companies are still perplexed in what to do first.  Many times it’s as simple as having a real test bed for executives and employees alike to engage and interact and get their “hands dirty” a bit.  So here we go with the 3 questions for today:

1. What’s the difference between a social network and a community?

2. What should a business or company focus on…Developing a Community or developing a social network?

3. What are the success metrics to look for in each?

This week’s chat will be flying (you might want to stretch first) so join us early at noon est using #socialmedia.

Develop a Corporate Listening Grid

Sunday, May 17th, 2009

improve-listening-skillsIf you have followed us at all you will know that we are trying to get beyond the traditional social media speak of “The keys to social media, listen and be transparent….blah, blah, blah”.  So when talking to the fine folks at Radian6 you can imagine the excitement when we actually got energized talking about LISTENING.  Listening is important, yet even the most seasoned gurus don’t have a good grasp on how to help companies modify their beings to incorporate an interactive culture beyond the one twenty-something who’s willing to give it a shot.  So let’s set a baseline for discussion:

Companies have spent the last few decades building a corporate veil over their brands and relying on having the few “experts” create the features and develop a voice for the Brand.  That focus on experts lead to knowledge and skills being huddled into only a couple, select employees.  That egalitarian style that was developed throughout the 80s and 90s is now counter-intuitive to the social movement.  This is why companies are having so many cultural problems in allowing more access to people throughout companies with insight that is traditionally suppressed.

On Tuesday, we’ll focus the discussion around developing a fundamental plan for companies to create and instill a Listening Grid of sorts.  A way for executives to plan their way through opening tracks of interactive dialogue with customers, partners, channels, or even other employees.  The three questions will be:

  • 1. What is the cultural shift that needs to happen today in business to accommodate social media?
  • 2. We get listening for the detractors. What are other ways that companies need to listen?
  • 3. Let’s develop a list or chronology of how to create a listening grid within a company.

We are very excited to welcome David Alston as our moderator this week.  David is the head of marketing at Radian 6 and will be sure to add a ton of value as his expertise is an inch wide and a mile deep in this particular topic.  Please join us this Tuesday at Noon EST and be sure to include #socialmedia in your tweets to have your input captured here at www.hashtagsocialmedia.com/live.