Posts Tagged ‘Content’

The New Digital Press Release

Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010

So who are today’s most effective communicators in business?  Yesterday I might have answered with corporate public relations (PR) when they send our their press release over the wire.  Today though, we have bloggers updating posts and getting thousands or tens of thousands of views in a day.   If you simply changed the title from blogger to corporate PR could you get the same effect? 

What’s the value of the traditional press release today?  Press releases that are done in the same fashion as they were 5 years ago are a waste of time and precious resource.  People don’t read that way anymore, there are way too many other releases (blogs) that compete for the same timeshare and press releases that are built for the wire or for the corporate press page on the website will never get seen again.

There are many people beginning to catch on to today’s journalistic requirements and only a handful who started the revolution as much as 4 years ago (Todd Defren, Shift Communictions, has this initial social media press release template available).  And the discussion today has shifted a bit further into push vs. pull styles for PR.  The press release of today is more than a spiffed up template though.  The voice of the release is different, the tone, the content, the target and the media by which to express it is different.  Here are some points to consider in the new digital press release:

  1. concise content – It’s not about crafting a story as it is about feeding quality content
  2. no buzzword bingo – content has to be in the language of the audience not the made up language of the company
  3. Targeted to audiences – much like advanced websites provide me content related to my previous viewing and digital ads can be served up ad hoc in seconds, press releases need to have a message targeted to specific audiences.  It’ possible you write 3 intros to the same release with different angles of the content based on the audience who is viewing it.
  4. multi-media – text is boring, video is cool.  Include images, podcasts, videos, schematics, etc to enhance the content.  I believe we are close to having press releases taking the form of all video very soon (no text).
  5. Make it shareable (referring to point #2, see usually I would say extensible) – provide a 140 character summary and shortened URL on the release, add a Facebook “Like” button, create a focused posterous page, etc.

Today’s world is challenging enough that all parts of the orgnaization need to be operating seemlessly.  Having effective press releases is certainly one of those important pieces of the overall pie.  For proper attribute on the topic, I want to give props to Cyndee Woolley for the idea of this topic and for teeing up this week’s moderator Shel Holtz.  Shel wrote the book on corporate conversations (well five of them actually) and has been speaking and writing on the topic for more than a decade.  Shel will lead the discussion with the following questions:

 Topic: The New Digital Press Release

Q1:  What value do you see to a social media news release or a social media
newsroom?

Q2:  Are there still uses for the traditional news release?

Q3:  How do you combine traditional media relations with social media?

Please join us in the conversation on Tuesday 6/22  noon Eastern by following #sm65 on twitter or by going to our LIVE page at www.hashtagsocialmedia.com/live.

The Importance of a Content and Engagement Strategy in Social Media

Sunday, March 14th, 2010

We understand that having a blog or forum alone is not being social, it’s simply a tool set.  If you are a little overzealous and implement the tools first, you quickly understand that it is going to take more…a lot more than just tools to live up to the expectations that everyone has around social media.  So you sit in the middle of your corporate blog or new customer service forum and wonder what’s next.  Try a content and / or engagement strategy.

Without engagement there is no social and without content there is no engagement.  From this, it becomes apparent that developing a strategy around content and engagement can be very useful.  So where to start?

Content without engagement is a traditional approach to marketing like television or radio.  The content goes one way or is “pushed” at the audience.  While we could take an editorial approach to content development, let’s look at it a bit differently.  Whether you produce the content, your agency produces it, whether your content is available on external sites or your own sites, there is still a premise that I come back to.  Consumers buy products because they believe in the product, they relate to it, the product description fulfills a need or some other reason that stems from the fact that something about the content was relevant enough to make me purchase whether its ingredients, description, a jingle, ad copy, whatever, there was some form of trust around that content.  This is the key, your content has to instill trust with your participants.

With all the aggregation tools out there, it is easy to take the lazy way out of creating content for your corporate social initiatives.  Like a Twitter account that only re-tweets or a blog run on yahoo pipes, that content can be found anywhere so there is no reason to trust your company as a resource for content.  Like your content, your company becomes irrelevant quickly too.  Create content that sets your company apart, create a perspective that participants can have passion with and always do it under the premise that no matter what the content, your participants have to be able to trust it.  The first time they find a hole or blatant lie in your content, you will lose that trust for a very long time.

On the other hand, engagement without content feels empty and does not last long.  Like any guy at a bar without a good pick-up line, he can smile, approach and may smell good but after standing there for a while, you’re going to have to get past the “Hi, I’m Joe/Jeff/Bob/Mike, what’s your name?”.  There are many reasons for engagement and while most strategists will focus on what your company has to do to get ready to be engaging, don’t forget to think about why anyone would want to participate with your company.  A good, initial litmus test is whether you can answer the “So What?” question.  You arm the interns with conversational research data, you’ve been listening for months, you have tons of ideas for content and the executives are behind it.  If you are selling toilet paper, my response is “so what?”, why would a consumer care to participate around the product?  In this case, create a passion much like General Mills did with their Box Tops campaign to raise money for k-8 schools.

Does engagement or content come first?  If I create content and no one is listening, is it worth my time?  On the other side, if your customers are passionate around your Brand and want to participate, you better get some content so they have a reason to come back.  I’m not sure there is a right answer for everyone.  The right answer depends on every company’s unique situation, resources, time, talent and ability to execute.  Our moderator this week knows a lot about these answers and we are excited to have John Cass leading the way.  John has literally written the book on corporate blogging and has a wealth of experience to share with us.  The topic this week will be:

Topic: The Importance of a Content and Engagement Strategy in Social Media

Q1: What’s first, content marketing and/or engagement marketing as the lead strategy?

Q2: How should you handle disclosure of content origination whether employees or agency?

Q3: Charlene Li’s engagement 2009 report staked out most engaged brands, what’s key to implement a successful SM engagement strategy?

Please join us on Tuesday March 16 at noon EST to share your point of view.  Follow along on #sm51 or from our LIVE page.

Image: www.cartoonstock.com

Sponsored Conversations & What It Means for Businesses

Monday, August 24th, 2009

Sponsored ConversationsThis has certainly been the year for discussions around sponsored conversations in social media.  The term of a sponsored conversation is mostly described as paid for blog posts.  While this is certainly one piece of it, it certainly is not the entire scope of paid-for PR/advertising and limiting the conversation to only bloggers does not provide for a well-educated perspective by which to make reasonable business decisions. 

So what does the scope of sponsored conversations look like? Jeremiah does a good job of referencing lists of sponsored initiatives and the companies doing them but still this list is mostly focused on bloggers either being paid or getting free products to “blog” (review, rate, create content, post, etc) about them.  What is often over-looked is when companies hire other companies to create content, product releases, buzz, etc on the client’s behalf.  Finally, out of all of this do we need regulations in the form of government intervention (ala FTC) or a governing body to be the gatekeepers?

For companies paying individuals, the discussion is quite mature but still scattered (IZEA sponsored a report from Forrester).  How much should companies be allowed to pay? Should bloggers be able to make money for producing quality content and garnering a faithful following?  What’s the difference between paying Cris Brogan to stay at your hotel chain and hiring Kevin Garnett to wear your shoes? Heck, I eat entire meals for free every time I hit Costco with the free samples there.

For companies paying other companies it seems that this is either completely acceptable or it simply is not talked about much.  Sure there are examples of some intermediary screw-ups like Edelman with Wal-mart but surely there is more than this re-hashed story from 3 years ago.  Right?  Of course, PR firms are hired all the time to create content on behalf of their client and ghost-write posts.  Interactive agencies are always “taking care” of the content needs of their clients and passing it off as the client’s work.  Then you have Analysts who create reports using paying clients (intentionally left un-hyperlinked ;-) and socially connected Lobbyists influencing entire governing bodies.  Think about the newspaper industry using expert opinions from companies who advertise with them.

This week’s moderator, Shannon Paul certainly has her hands full with this topic but also has the hands on experience to lead us through it.  Working on the corporate side with the Detroit RedWings and now with PEAK6, she has practical experience that is invaluable and being a social media Rock Star in her own right certainly doesn’t hurt either.  This week’s discussion will be:

Sponsored Conversations & What It Means for Businesses

Q:1  What are the challenges / benefits from paying individuals to create conversations?

Q2:  What are the challenges / benefits from paying other companies to create conversations?

Q3:  What type of disclosure is needed and does it require a governing body?

This chat will start Tuesday 12 noon EST and last for 1 hour.  To participate simply use the #socialmedia on Twitter from anywhere.  To follow along more easily simply goto our LIVE page.