Posts Tagged ‘jason breed’

Social Media Content Strategy

Tuesday, October 26th, 2010

Lot’s has been written in the social sphere (here, here, here to name a few) about developing and maintaining a content management strategy in the new digital age.  Most of the advice follows the same lines of think like a publisher, write for SEO value, content is king / frequent content is the pharaoh, create an editorial calendar, an so on.  All of those thing are right.  Yet still there is something missing.

When I go to companies (fortune 100 at least) and talk about content strategies, we can go through the list above, they shake their heads like they understand and go off and create the first version of the plan.  When they come back, they have an editorial calendar, SEO strategy that ties into the calendar and is the basis for the content development, a framework (style guide) for the channels (tweets, releases, blogs, etc) and a list of every piece of communique that is to be released in the next two months, already pre-approved by legal.  Time to sit back and enjoy the fruits of our collective work, right?

This type of approach is provides the same one-way push mentality and does not set the tone for the type of change that has to take place within a company in order to truly adopt a pervasive content strategy suitable for today’s Social Business.  Here’s what I mean:

Pre-approved content, style guides and a the PR team misses the point of today’s connected enterprise.  Before developing a “traditional” content strategy (like the one listed above), develop an employee training schedule.  If any employee expresses an interest in communicating digitally, take them through the type of PR training that you would give to your senior executives.  Have an ongoing training curriculum on key SEO terms to be included, strategies for each person (thought leader, helper, insider’s view to company, etc) and ideas for participation. 

This is a new way to think about PR.  Instead of outward focus, PR should think of themselves as content enablers not creators.  Enable an army of employees to communicate effectively, in unison, on purpose, with trust.  Enable them with the industry influencers they should connect with, the blogs they should comment on, the though leadership pieces that are timely.  Maybe an effective content strategy for the enterprise is made up of dozens of individual strategies that all feed into the same corporate goals that includes the proper training.  Is this the new look of content management strategy?

Content management is usually an afterthought.  Companies decide to become social, set up their tools then wonder why it looks so bare.  It’s that point when someone thinks to adopt a new content strategy that includes social.  To help us re-consider our approach to content management for social, we are happy to have the CEO of Social Media Delivered, Eve Mayer Orsburn.  Eve is a recognized figure in social media circles and has a new book being released in just a few days entitled: Social Media for the CEO: The Why & ROI of Social Media for the CEO of Today and Tomorrow.  Our topic and questions this week are:

Topic:  Social Media Content Strategy

Q1:  Why is a SM content strategy important?

Q2:  How can you make content really work for your business?

Q3:  What are the key components of a good content marketing strategy?

Please join us Tuesday October 26, at 12 noon ET.  You can follow along using #sm83 from your favorite Twitter client or simply use our home page at www.hashtagsocialmedia.com/live.

Knowing Your Customer As Well As They Know You Through Social

Tuesday, October 19th, 2010

The rise of the customer.  That is the motto for most every social media guru holding court in social media meetings everywhere.  The customer is now in charge, they control your brand, they can lift up the veil and get behind the covers of your organization like never before.  The customer influences everything now based on the power of information and reach that social media provides.

I just have one question though.  If customers have all this access to everything all the sudden, why don’t companies counter with more intelligence?  Raise the stakes?

Consumers in general have very little time.  Consumers in general have limited technical ability and comparatively have tiny budgets.  Even with those limited resources, consumers are able to create communications nightmares for companies who are spending even less time, money and resources to address new digital issues.  Think about the advantage across the enterprise if companies took the time to learn about their customers.  If they actually sent a birthday wish to those who make it available on Facebook.  If they new when a person walked in the store that they were having an issue with the last product they purchased from you.  If you knew a customer felt a strong positive conviction about your company yet was never compelled to tell anyone about it. 

Imagine you did know these things, how could you react (or pro-act in this case)?  First, everyone loves a birthday wish, this sentiment goes a long way.  Next, if you knew a customer was having an issue with a product, you would be crazy not to greet them with a manager as they walked in and solve whatever issue they have before it exacerbates.  Finally, if someone has a great experience and was grateful for your service, provide them with a book of coupons or online codes to give out to their digital networks with 7 day expiration.  That satisfied person will create more positive stir than any madison ave agency could do….and for the cost of a couple of online codes that might get used.

Companies need to re-imagine the competitive landscape, adapt and overcome.  Make it a priority to know more about your customers than they know about you.  Afterall, you have millions or even billions of dollars of resources, access to the latest technologies and armies of people to better utilize.  The only reason a customer can out-flank a company digitally is very simple – they have a purpose.  Whatever the issue is, they are on a mission.  Adversitity becomes the mother of invention and customers sneak up on a sleeping corporate adversary.

So let’s start the process of re-imagining with some how-bouts, what-ifs.  what if you put unique url on every mailer that went out that was tied to a person.  Everytime that person visits, you learn more about them and are also able to reverse look-up their IP address and create a database of publicly available  information (yes, this exists).  Or use SMS (text messaging), pro-active bluetooth messaging or QR codes to engage customers walking by your store front.  Once you have a mobile number, you can learn LOT’s of information if you are able to handle the data management.

What if you actually had a mobile strategy beyond “Let’s create an app” and used engaging apps to capture information and WAP sites to better convert prospects.  Both are driven through mobile, yet used effectively, both offer very different types of interaction and outcome.  All of this becomes building blocks for continuously capturing information about consumers at every touchpoint that they are open to providing if you structure it the right way (note: I am not refering to a survey here, old school marketers).

In the 1960′s & 1970′s successful marketers created personas around their products.  “If you want to look like this, use our products” and people inferred a lifestyle if they associated with that product.  Today, it’s the opposite.  Consumers are creating digital lifestyle personas.  Their LinkedIn accounts portray what they aspire to be from souped up experiences they may have had (who says they “stocked feminine hygeine products at Walgreens”? No, it reads “I designed product placement for essential needs”).  their Facebook accounts portray the lifestyle they want their friends to see, and so on.  It is up to companies now to review their customers personas and target those customers that best fit the product.  It is up to the companies to become more prepared than their customers.  The companies who do this first will have a decade head start over their competitors be more in tune to deliver what their customers need.

This may sound like a lot, so that’s why we asked Tim Hayden to help all of us out by moderating this week.  As the Head of Strategy and Partner with Blue Clover, Tim has a long history of innovative marketing and digital leadership.  To help us think differently, Tim will run with the following questions:

Topic: Knowing Your Customer As Well As They Know You Through Social

Q1:  What “offline” touchpoints do you leverage to drive online engagement (social)?

Q2:  When do you provide a mobile app vs a mobile website?

Q3:  What can you use socially to “learn” more about your customers?

We invite you to join the conversation on Tuesday 10/19/10 at 12 noon ET.  The chat will take place on Twitter.  Follow along by using #sm82 or simply goto our LIVE page at www.hashtagsocialmedia.com/live.

Ideation: Driving Innovation or Just Talk?

Tuesday, October 12th, 2010

Whenever someone rattles off the primary benefits of having social in the enterprise, they start with brand awareness, then sales, service, product innovation, internal and then it slopes off from there.  Yet when I look at all the examples that people share and listen to all the people in the space discuss corporate implementations, you don’t hear about many instances of product innovation and we’ll simplify it even more with just Innovation.

For this purpose, we will describe innovation as the generation, selection and implementation of ideas that drive value back to an organization.  Notice I did not specify where the ideas come from as there are many ways to solicit ideas.  Here are a few with optimum outcomes:

  1. Employees: No one knows your business better. Lean on employees to innovate around internal processes, products, administrative, employee satisfaction.  Some ideation efforts might be for bounty (prize for the best idea, most profitable, etc), some might be collaborative with team submissions.
  2. Customers: Often times companies stick an ideation platform out to customers and ask them to innovate.  The majority of the time I see this lead to more trouble than it’s worth.  The customers “ideas” are usually how to make the experience better and lead to incremental improvements.  This approach also becomes a time suck for the staff who has to manage it as well.  Customers are best used to provide ideas on what theywould  like most and do so in focused, campaign driven events.  This will help you manage staffing to evaluate the volume that comes from this channel.
  3. Partners:  This group is arguably the ones who can bring the best ideas around efficiency, process, scaling and new innovations from the outside to incorporate.  Your partners are the experts in their specific domain and have an interest in selling you more things.  If you innovate with their ideas, then usually that will mean more business for the partner who suggested it.
  4. Outside Experts: will bring the most ideas on new products, new business ideas and ideas that are more patentable.  These are people with a passion around your domain and have a “killer idea” for you.  The ideas from this group are not usually incremental, these are game changers.

As you can see there are many ways to innovate through ideas, however the outcomes will be very different based on what you ask for and who you ask.  This is an important point because up until now the majority of companies have asked for ideas in general just to say they are innovating.  That can become a very dicey situation. 

There is more to innovation that slapping up an idea management platform, asking for responses to a blog or even just having a form fill on your site.  At a very high level: Some ideas will run into IP issues (intellectual property), some incremental idea projects will simply overload the team and create more hassle than value.  Even if the ideas are all relevant, you need a way to triage them as the come in.  Once you get the ideas and sort them you will need to get them to the right people in your organization, create workflow and a way to create budget for implementation. 

The whole concept of innovating through the crowdsourcing of ideas is a powerful, yet underutilized strategy.  For those who do try to implement an ideation project, it becomes a tool deployment effort and not a true innovation effort.  That is the reason we are discussing this very concept this week through our weekly industry chat series around the “Business of Social Media”.  Usually we get an industry leader and bring them in to moderate the session for us.  Being in our 81st week of this project, we have had some dandy moderators.  This week may just be the best though :-) .  Actually, I, Jason Breed am moderating this week.  I know how we vet our moderators to bring you the best of the best in order to raise the level of conversation and for that reason, I am honored that the team finally said it’s time for me to take one.  So here we go.  The topic and questions will be:

Topic: Ideation: Driving Innovation or Just Talk?

Q1:  What’s the difference between ideation, innovation, suggestion box?

Q2:  When do you make ideas open for public rating?

Q3:  What are key factors in making innovation programs successful?

The event will take place Tuesday, 10/12/10 at 12 noon ET.  The format will stay the same with the 1st question at 12 followed by Q2 at 12:20 then Q3 at 12:40.  Follow along on the conversation with #sm81 from your favorite Twitter client or simply follow our LIVE page at www.hashtagsocialmedia.com/live.

Are We at the End of the Social Side of Networking?

Tuesday, October 5th, 2010

As I consult with enterprise companies there is always a question of participation.  It starts when I land and managers tell me (some proudly, some ashamed) how many people participate in their current efforts.  I don’t give this much weight because usually the initiative was set up once and never touched again.  This is hard to draw any conclusions from.  Then as we begin deploying or re-deploying an initiative, everyone wants to know (magically) what to expect. 

That’s when I pull out the old 1% rule, make some calculations, and come back (magically) with some numbers.  Funny thing is that no one ever asks how I got the numbers or where they came from, they are just happy to have a goal.  Interestingly enough, the projects that have matured a bit are always very close overall to those numbers.  One caveat that I have seen is that the broader the audience, the closer the rule is.  The more focused the audience, the more that rule turns up-side-down.

The 1% rule (1/9/90) as defined by Wikipedia: 

The 1% rule states that the number of people who create content on the internet represents approximately 1% (or less) of the people actually viewing that content (e.g., For every one person who posts on a forum, there are at least ninety-nine other people viewing that forum but not posting). The term was coined by authors and bloggers Ben McConnell and Jackie Huba[2] although there are earlier references to the same concept[3] that did not use this name.

The “90-9-1″ version of this rule states that 1% of people create content, 9% edit or modify that content, and 90% view the content without contributing.

The actual percentage is likely to vary depending upon the subject matter. For example, if a forum requires content submissions as a condition of entry, the percentage of people who participate will probably be significantly higher than one percent but the content producers will still be a minority of users. This is validated in a study conducted by Michael Wu, who uses economics techniques to analyze the participation inequality across hundreds of communities segmented by industry, audience type, and community focus.[4]

This can be compared with the similar rules known to information science, such as the 80/20 rule known as the Pareto principle, that 20% of a group will produce 80% of the activity, however the activity may be defined.

A case in point:  I have a sample of data from a Fortune 50 company who set up an external Yammer network.  A look at X Company Yammer participation bears this out. Currently there are over 2,050 members of the XYZ Yammer network. Of that number, 1.29% of those, or 27 people, are responsible for 57% of the total posts. And 1972 people, 94% of the member population, are responsible for only 26% of all posts – each of those people have posted less than 25 times. This data was from January of 2010.  I looked at the recent numbers (1 month ago) and while the number of participants has increased significantly to over 7k members, the number of active participants have risen ever so slightly to 38 people that are responsible for 57% of the overall posts.

So what’s happening to the network?  Employees are reporting higher amounts of value from the network and IT dept is taking notice at the, (now) statistically relevant, number of people migrating onto the network.  Yet, the number of power users as a percent is down.  One behaviour that I noticed was that the network has transformed in use.  In the “new shiny toy” phase, employees were posting everything from musings, to rants, to accomplishments, etc.  Now the network is being used more as a shortcut to get things done, get access to the “right” people and generally as a utility to collaborate more efficiently.

 This coincides with a recent research report from Forrester onGlobal Update of Social Technographics that found a slowing of the Creative class while the Joiner class was in an upward climb.  Interesting, I know!

Which leads us to the topic for this week’s chat.  With this topic of the decline of the “Social” in Social Networking, we went right to the horse’s (nothing meant by that) mouth.  One of Forrester’s most prolific Senior Analysts, Augie Ray, has agreed to moderate this insightful topic.  This issue has many implications that we will cover including the decline of participation and what that means to communities and also if communities decline what does that mean to the digital marketing arms of companies who are transitioning entire departments to better manage social.  This week’s topic and questions are:

Topic:  Are We at the End of the Social Side of Networking?

Q1:  Is there too much content being created?

Q2:  What will marketers do if fewer are willing to generate new content?

Q3:  How will social networks change with more joiners and less creators?

 Join us this week on Tuesday 10/5/10 at noon eastern for this lively discussion.  Follow along with #sm80 from your favorite Twitter client or check out the new features in our recently updated LIVE page at www.hashtagsocialmedia.com/live

Professionalization of the Social Media Industry

Tuesday, September 28th, 2010

It’s interesting to look back over the last few years as it relates to social media in the enterprise.  Just consider the corporate process of buy in around social.  Initially, employees, detractors or zealots were jumping into social on behalf of the company.  Kicking and screaming, companies started to dip their own toe in the water by testing and piloting blogs, forums, communities, etc.  Recently, I have noticed companies beginning to get serious about social media.  One way to tell, look at the positions they are hiring for here and here.

Hiring a few of these positions myself, I am wondering what companies are looking for in candidates.  Social is a strange bird as no one company created it and no one technology runs it.  Therefore there are no processes, textbooks, online courses, etc that cover all the skills a “social” leader needs to have in order to be effective.  In fact, social media has become such a bucket term that anything that smells like an online interaction gets the label.  That includes search, CRM, community mgr, web architect, public relations (blogger), recruiting (HR) and others.  Companies can hire any of these positions with some proficiency.  Add the word “social” in front of it and it sends shivers of consternation through hiring managers.  Those managers don’t know how to differentiate a blogging skillset which is more journalistic in nature from a digital strategist from a community manager (think traffic cop).  To make sure you are getting the right person for the job, What keywords do you use to search? what questions do you interview with? what skills do you test for?

Companies are tentative now as they have gone after social skills that understood how to set up a blog but did not know how large corporations run in complex environments.  They understand how to get small groups of people interested in having online conversations but they don’t understand the pshychology or cultural elements that go into consumer marketing.  The other side is to take existing employees and train them to be social.  This helps align the needs of the business and the intricacies of getting things done but assumes a ramp up time to come up-to-speed on becoming social.

This approach to professionalizing your social efforts assumes that it is a personnel issue.  I’m not exactly sold on that either.  Socialmedia has effectively transformed the way we communicate in many ways, it did not invent it.  Companies who have never wanted to communicate with partners or customers before, simply don’t have the culture to do it today, whether they have a staffer who can blog or not.  So it becomes an organizational design issue not a staffing issue.  Companies who are set up in silos or independent operating groups or P&L’s are simply not designed to communicate across department whether you have the latest version of Jive or SharePoint or not.  There is something more fundamental to becoming a social business than a couple of trained people or a few new toys.

Another interesting point of view on this topic can be found here: http://healthissocial.com/process-improvement/professional-development-in-the-age-of-social-media/ ( a solid post by Phil Baumann)

So what is the best way to professionalize your company’s approach to social media?  How do you take it to the next level?  This week’s chat will take this discussion head on!  To facilitate the dialogue we have Chris Heuer, a proven innovator who has been able to re-invent himself many times over.  Chris is best known recently for co-founding the Social Media Club that has become the connecting point for the professionals in the social media industry.  there is no one better to help figure out how to professionalize the social media efforts of businesses.  This week’s topic and questions are:

Topic: Professionalization of the Social Media Industry

Q1: How do you determine a professional from a wanna be?

Q2: Does the bucket term “Social” need to be broken into specialties?

Q3: What pieces of social can you learn from books? From experience?

Join us this week 9/28/10 at noon eastern by following #sm79 from your favorite Twitter client or simply participate from our LIVE page at www.hashtagsocialmedia.com/live.

Does Pharma REALLY have anything to offer in social networking?

Tuesday, September 21st, 2010

Social media and social networks provide an increasingly popular way for consumer and companies to engage and interact. Consumers are not bound by regulations in the way they communicate. They are free to discuss their healthcare issues with anyone they want. Whether sharing advice on medications and their off-label uses or talking about a weird thing that happened to them medically and “oh-by-the-way” I was taking this medication when it started happening, consumers are free to share this information when and how they want.

For pharmaceutical and insurance companies, these same conversations can cause severe cases of heartburn for regulatory and compliance departments if these topics were to be brought up on a social networking site sponsored by said company. Off-label uses cannot be condoned by the pharma company and allowing a C2C conversation to happen without correcting it may be considered condoning it if brought into legal proceedings. The “oh-by-the-way” discussion could be considered an Adverse Event (AE) and would therefore need to be registered into an AE database that is regulated by the FDA.

As you can see these relatively benign instances that happen all over Facebook, Twitter and other social networks every day fall directly into a regulatory grey area for pharmaceutical and insurance companies. Without direct legislation and regulation, many companies have chosen to stay away from social media for the time being. The problem is that social media is not going away and that social engagement could pave a potentially lucrative path to new revenues and new opportunities for those companies who can figure out how to harness the power of social.

Understanding what regulations are in place and applying them to social we help shape a foundation by which to develop better guidelines for participation in social media and social networks.

Be Clear in Conversations
The range and depth of biotech, pharma and health care regulations are vast. They cover a wide range of areas spanning how you manage clinical trials to manufacturing to sales and control of patient information. While discussing the talking points in this document let’s be clear that our assumptions are that:
     * You are using your social network to manage outreach to bring interested parties into the fold to inform them of where to get information, gather their ideas, priorities and interests, and connect them with other professionals with related interests and expertise. This might include:
          o Foster greater collaboration on new products
          o Improve internal processes
          o Increase the effectiveness and efficiency managing regulatory compliance
          o Enable doctors and patients to more easily access needed information
          o Increasing the efficiency in the delivery of health care through innovation and collaboration
          o Strengthen post-marketing pharmacovigilance their products

     * You are not using your social network to manage clinical trial subject data; drug, biologic or medical device manufacturing data; or safety data

What are the Regulations that Need to Be Considered?

     The two primary bodies of regulation to watch are:
1. Title 21 CFR Part 11 - Title 21, Part 11 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) which deals with the FDA guidelines on electronic records and electronic signatures
2. HIPAA Title IIHealth Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) protects the ability for workers and their families to gain access to health care when the switch employers or jurisdictions (i.e., when they move). Title II of HIPPA contains something called The Privacy Rule that governs the use and disclosure of Protected Health Information (PHI).

The other area to understand is how to manage Adverse Events which falls under the term Pharmacovigilance.
1. Pharmacovigilance: Generally speaking, pharmacovigilance is the science of collecting, monitoring, researching, assessing and evaluating information from healthcare providers and patients on the adverse effects of medications, biological products, herbalism and traditional medicines

     How to Incorporate These Regulations into Social
The following talking points are meant to address how we can meet regulatory guidelines by implementing technology in very particular ways to mitigate regulatory concerns and still engage stakeholders in a meaningful way.

First, there are two over-riding recommendations when incorporating social media. They are:
1. Separate social networking infrastructure from regulated legacy systems. You do not want to unduly subject your social networking infrastructure to all of the regulations that fall under regulated systems therefore it is absolutely critical to ensure you separate the social networking components of your Health 2.0 infrastructure from your other enterprise systems.
2. House all UGC in a true enterprise data warehouse. By pulling social networking UGC into a enterprise data warehouse and providing your safety monitoring team access to this, you are providing them a new channel to mine and monitor safety information.

With regard to specific regulations, here is how they can be incorporated into social media:

Title 21, Part 11 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) that deals with FDA guidelines on electronic records and signatures. With social engagement, we recommend three key elements:
1. Never Delete: data needs to be Archived or turned “Inactive” not deleted.
2. Use secure, electronic signatures: which relates to only letting authenticated users contribute content (no anonymous contributions).
3. Documentation of Compliance: be able to demonstrate that you have designed, built and tested a system that does the above. This includes documenting requirements, design, test cases and successful completion of those test cases. It also includes demonstration that your configuration management processes ensure that the code you have in production has completed full documentation of the above before going to production.

HIPAA Title II: specifically the Privacy Rule that governs the use and disclosure of Protected Health Information (PHI). We recommend three key elements:
1. Closed Groups – create specific areas that can be closed from general populations (ie.HIV, Diabetes, etc groups). To create even tighter requirements you can apply white list/black list rules to enforce group requirements (even blacklisting insurance domains).
2. Strict Adherence to Profile Information – Do not capture any PHI data fields. Strongly encourage Display Names to not include names or other identifiers (this includes either prohibiting Avatars or only allowing members to pick from a list generic Avatar icons). Finally, encrypt all profile information (and – to assure Part 11 compliance – never delete past profile information.)
3. Moderate all UGC – this is limiting in participation and taxing on resources however there is a mix of moderation and publication that can limit a user’s exposure (through the use of coordinate inputs for instance).
Pharmacovigilance: pertains to patients reporting adverse drug effects. There are a couple of items here including moderation and having a true data warehouse to store your social content and easily mine and manage information and content.

Source: Much of this content was pulled or modified from http://www.exsecutus.com/haughwout/2009/07/health20-ugc-mgmt which is the work of Jim Haughwout.

So now we’ve covered the regulatory side of the issues that pharma faces in social.  So what can they do?  That is what our moderator this week is going to help us figure out.  Moderating this week is Steve Woodruff.  Steve is one of the leading minds in helping to figure out social in regulated industries.  The topic this week and the questions are:

Topic:  Does Pharma REALLY have anything to offer in social networking?

Q1:  I think pharma companies are generally evil and I don’t want to hear from them. Am I right?

Q2:  I have health questions and would really like to hear from these companies. Can they talk?

Q3:  What are pharma companies actually doing in the social space, and is it worth anything?

Join us on Tuesday 9/21 at noon ET for the #socialmedia chat by following #sm78 from your favorite Twitter client or simply follow our LIVE site at www.hashtagsocialmedia.com/live.

Living on Borrowed Time? The Ad Agency Model is Changing

Monday, September 13th, 2010

If you have ever watched Mad Men, it is interesting to explore how agencies used to work….last week.  The cable series,  Mad Men, is suppposed to depict a time when the free-wheeling agencies on Madison Ave influenced what people bought and how they were supposed to think about products.  The interesting thing about the agencies depicted by Mad Men is they still operate much the same today as they did 50-60 years ago, what has changed though, is their decreasing ability to influence consumers.  Why are agencies stuggling to stay relevant with a model that has worked for so long?

          Business is becoming more about customer relationships rather than transactions.

Social media has changed the expectation of the consumer.  The digital landscape has created more opportunities and more challenges than at any time in the history of advertising.  Advertising agencies have been slow to react not because they are slow, they just don’t know what the new model should look like.  Attempting to bridge the gap:

  • Traditional agencies are trying to deploy technologies. 
  • Digital agencies are trying to  manage brands
  • Brands are trying to hire managers to oversee commerce, digital, social, technology, etc
  • Technology firms are trying to dis-intermediate the agency by going direct to the Brands
  • The world has been in one of the most challenging economic times since the 1930′s.

All of this together and the fact that agencies are pitching against very different competitive bidders to win new business and fighting to stay relevant when they actually do get a piece of business.  The world of advertising continues to become more complex.  There used to be a handful of consumer touchpoints from radio to 5 channels on television, now there’s millions of digital and hundreds of television touchpoints.  If this was all that had changed, the old agency models might still be working with expertise divided into practice units (brand design, direct, PR, events, promotions, multicultural and now digital).  Not only have the amount of touchpoints dramatically increased, the expectations of the client and the consumer have also dramatically changed.

  • New Client Demands: Integration & Accountability – companies are competing in a truly global economy.  Even smaller firms are able to compete across the globe thanks to digital.  In order to do this effectively, marketing cannot continue to be a siloed department.  Campaigns must integrate with CRM, commerce, logistics systems (shipping) and service to provide the level of experience and services that consumers now expect.  Marketers are also coming under more scrutiny to deliver results not just campaigns.  The have one of the largest cost centers and CEOs are demanding to see an impact on business.
  • New Consumer Demands: Engagement over the long term – Marketing is no longer a series of campaigns, it’s a commitment to the customer.  It is no longer OK for companies to run 15 campaigns across 12 brands using 7 different agencies in an un-coordinated and inconsistent manner.  Consumers love to buy, but hate being sold to.  Marketers cannot push message after message without a way to develop relationships with key customers.  Understanding that EVERY consumer touchpoint is an opportunity to over-deliver on the company experience, systems must be integrated from the ad on the web, to the message on the website, to the box that comes in the mail, to the person on the phone/chat in customer service….over the next 16 years.

Now I don’t know what the right model looks like.  Agencies like Crispin, Porter + Bogusky are helping us re-imagine the digital possibilities through experience innovation and agencies like R/GA are re-defining what the make-up of an agency should be (adding technology, SEO, social expertise along with traditional).  Even these front-runners are not integrated throughout the client nor do they look beyond the campaign overall.

For this week’s event we needed to find an innovator.  Someone who has been in the industry long enough to identify with the sacred cows and someone radical enough to help re-think them.  Hank Wasiak certainly fits the bill!  Hank has proven himself over and over again at the agency level, client level, creative and innovation.  This highly sought after industry revitalist is a must see wherever he goes.  To help us this week we decided on the following topic and subsequent questions:

Living on Borrowed Time? The Ad Agency Model is Changing

Q1: What do Brands expect from agencies today & are they delivering

Q2: How has social media altered the creative process and deployment of  marketing communications programs?

Q3: What does the agency of the future look like?

This week’s event will take place Tuesday 9/14 at noon ET as always.  To join in simply use the keyword #sm77 using your favorite Twitter client or go to out LIVE page at www.hashtagsocialmedia.com/live.

Social CRM and the Value to Organizations

Tuesday, September 7th, 2010

News Alert: Customers are beginning to use social networks to communicate between themselves and with you.  The conversations are happening with or without you.  Whatever you want your brand to be known as or the language you want to be associated to your brand is no longer up to you.

How do companies deal with this?  When the customer’s voice, in many cases, is louder than your own and when customer issues are put to public trial before you even know you’ve been charged with anything.  Let’s call this defense (yes I’m excited that America’s favorite past-time has started this weekend).  What about offense? 

     1.  Now you can begin to understand who might be in the market for your product. 

     2.  You might know when a customer is having issues with their product before they come to you (assuming they give you a chance to fix it). 

     3.  Can you fix a produt flaw as customers begin to first talk about it

 There are many other ways to take advantage of customers talking in online venues (see attached diagram from Altimeter Group’s research on SCRM released in March).  Everyone from the industry can tell you that Social Customer Relationship Management (SCRM) will help companies figure all this out.   The interesting part (as Jacob Morgan points out) is that companies don’t know to ask for a SCRM solution.  In fact, even if you could buy a SCRM solution if probably would not matter all that much.  SCRM is about much more than some piece of technology implementation.  The keys to being effective with your CRM, whether social or not, lie in a company’s ability to capitalize on information as they get it.  To be able to course correct in the midst of a product launch when it was not in the plans.  That seems to be what SCRM is about.  It’s the ability for companies to adapt to their customers rather than adapting to their internal technology paths.  It’s the ability to re-think how data is captured, stored and analyzed to produce better information than what your overpriced sales dudes can provide for you.

These are the opportunities that SCRM make available for companies.  Much like “getting a website” was to marketing in the mid 90′s, SCRM is a virtually untapped opportunity to differntiate your company…in your customer’s eyes.  So we know the value that SCRM can bring, now what are you supposed to do?  Unfortunately, there is not one answer that fits every situation.  There are some guidelines to follow and there are even enough examples out there to begin to model successful efforts if you are able to find them.   To help develop some better models and open us up to some expanded thinking on the topic is one of Altimeter Group’s famous business analysts/strategists, R “Ray” Wang.  Ray brings well earned, highly respected insight to this discusssion on creating value in organizations through Social CRM.  The title and questions are as follows: 

Topic:  SCRM and the Value to Organizations

Q1: What are the basic tenents of SCRM?

Q2: How can you begin to tie social into existing CRM?

Q3: Build a list of useful SCRM use cases. 

This week’s event will take place Tuesday 9/7 at noon eastern.  To participate simply follow #sm76 from any Twitter client or follow along from our LIVE page at www.hashtagsocialmedia.com

Measuring Social Media Influence Versus Popularity

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

Am I looking for popularity or influence?  It’s almost a quality vs. quantity.  Do companies or individuals actually understand the difference?

Marketers have been conditioned to grow brands by popularity over the years.  Show enough TV spots and billboards, add a catchy tagline and consumers will recall your brand when they are in stores.  This has worked well for many consumer goods products for decades.  Until now!  In the world of push marketing where consumers had no choice but to trust what you were saying (it was your brand why would you lie?), popularity worked.  If more consumers knew your name, the more you came up in general conversation, the check-out line and in your home.

The world is different now though.  The web and all things digital have changed the game on us.  Influence is quickly becoming the currency of choice on the web.  So what changed?  Now there is the expectation of a conversation not just a press release or a slogan.  Some of the most popular brands in the world have been smeared in the social dust (think Nestle, United Airlines, & Dominoes Pizza).  But these are all the most popular brands in their respective markets, right?

Let’s look at this issue from the perspective of individuals not businesses.  Everyone is in a rush to get the most followers on Twitter, the most friends on Facebook and the most viral views on Youtube.  That would equal popularity for most people.  Yet according to a recent study by ForeSee Results, Facebook ranks at the bottom for customer satisfaction.  What?  500m people and no one likes them?  That, my friends, says very clearly that you do not need popularity to have influence.

Or another example from the Bureau of Labor Statistics cites that in 2010 the most popular job (by volume) is that of a shop clerk.  The $20+k job has more than 4.2m people doing it, yet some of the least popular jobs (actors 40k and athletes 14k) carry the most influence.  When is the last time you saw a shop clerk with a Nike contract?

Whether an individual or a brand, what is it you should aspire to online, Popularity or Influence?  To help us with this discussion is Chuck HemannChuck is a social media director at WeissComm Partners and has been in the space for many years.    He is going to lead the conversation for the 75th #socialmedia event this Tuesday.  The topic and questions are as follows:

Topic: Measuring Social Media Influence Versus Popularity

Q1:  How do you define influence and popularity?

Q2:  What metrics can help define influence or popularity?

Q3:  Which (popularity or influence) is more important?

Join us for this event Tuesday 8/31 at noon eastern by following #sm75 from your favorite Twitter client.

Building Your Reputation Using Social Media

Tuesday, August 24th, 2010

The three most important components of who you are: reputation, reputation, reputation.

The social media industry spends a lot of time talking about the brand.  Whether it’s your corporate brand or your personal brand everyone has an opinion of how to market yourself.  That’s what it is afterall is marketing.  The branding police come in and say the product will conjure images of…..”being a kid again” or “going to the county fair” or (you get the pictures).  What happens after you buy the product and decide the packaging is hard to open or that it really doesn’t perform as advertised?  Well, they make television shows for that (PitchMen).   The same goes for your personal brand.  how many times have you “heard” about the accomplishments of someone then when you actually work with them only images of SnakeOil come to mind.  Once you “out” the product or the person, you will not use them again no matter how good the markting message is for them.

I have a hard time with spending so much time on your “Brand” for that reason.  All of it is glossy brochure-ware unless you can actually do something.  My preference is to push people and/or client’s brands to focus on their reputation.  Autos are a good example of what I mean, you don’t buy a Lamborghini for comfort and you don’t buy a Lexus to go fast.  Both are remarkable cars in their own right however the Lambo’s reputation is built around speed and the lexus around comfort.  That’s what you get when you buy them irrespective of whatever kind of marketing stuff they put in front of you. 

I pulled a couple of thoughts on personal reputation from the website Brand-Yourself (horrible name, I know).  They defined your reputation as this:

It’s the iconic who, what, why and how principle.
It’s developing, celebrating and using that internal and external persona, that is already there and a part of our DNA!

Who are you?
What do you stand for?
Why should you serve?
How can you better the community that supports you and the world you live in?

Who you are is the combination of your external appearance or image and your internal essence.
Whenever you are out professionally, make sure you are dressed appropriately and groomed. People do notice the fine points and that can say a lot about you. Ask any professional etiquette coach about how important style, flair and appropriateness is in making a first impression!

What you stand for is about your values, attitudes, demeanor and how you express your unique qualities.
Show people that and they will make a connection with you because we all look for those commonalities in our relationships with others. Kindness, sense of humor, integrity, generosity, creativity, caring all speak volumes about you to others.

Why you serve is how you want to be remembered.
Whatever causes or social leadership you are passionate about will not only drive and motivate you naturally but draw people to you. Step up, volunteer, join a cause, initiate an action, support one that needs some help.

So what does all this mean?  It means that it doesn’t matter if you have 3,ooo followers or 300,000 if you can’t articulate your strategy for a client.  It means, if you can’t legitimately help a client then refer them to someone who can.  It’s substance over talk, results over industry stats.  Our moderator this week knows alot about reputation as she has one of the best in the public relations industry.  Kami Watson Husye is the president and COO of Zoetica Media.  Kami is well respected for her work and her missions and will lead our discussion around managing your reputation.  The topic and questions this week are:

Topic: Building Your Reputation Using Social Media

Q1:  Is reputation more important than a “personal brand” in #socialmedia?

Q2:  Be it a personal or professional crisis, what is your plan for handling a negative backlash in #socialmedia?

Q3:  How do you scale online success for an organization or individual as your reputation grows?

This chat will take place on Tuesday August 24, 2010 at 12 noon eastern.  Follow #sm74 from any Twitter client or simply go to our LIVE page at www.hashtagsocialmedia.com/live.  The event will start at noon with the first question and Kami will move to the next question every 20 minutes for an hour.