Posts Tagged ‘Public Relations’

Does Public Relations Get The “Message” in Social Media

Tuesday, May 24th, 2011

Public Relations gets a bone as many PR professionals were the first in their companies to adopt social media.  Much like email, PR pros saw this as a great way to distribute messages to a larger audience at a cost that was next to nothing.  Social media became an instant hit in the PR circles for this reason.  For a long time and even still, PR managed much of what happened in companies that was centered in social media.  Now that social media is beginning to grow in importance within the enterprise many feel that social media should be controlled by marketing, CIO or controlled a bit by every department.  However, at a lot of companies, the PR professional is the only one with social media experience.

Here’s the rub, social media practictioners do not believe that social channels are best used for “pushing” messages.  Many marketers are trying to evolve to better “pull” messages from their audience and listen better.  These same practictioners argue that Public Relations does not have a strong history of evolving if you look at how little the Press Release of today has evolved since it appeared over a hundred years ago.  PR pros will argue they have started to evolve much of their work (and the forward thinking ones actually have IMO).  Examples like the new press release, HARO and #soloPR and #PRChat (weekly twitter chats) are helping to advance the ball, but is it fast enough?

Social media is evolving quickly within companies right now.  There are new advances almost daily and practitioners are trying to derive value across the board.  A bit of the issue is the notion of value.  Social media is too new to have a playbook or even a “right” way to do it and everyone has their own version of what value is.  For marketers it’s brand messaging and conversion, for PR pros, its creating and distributing corporate messages.  Therein lies the contention.  From my experience working within Fortune class companies, I’m not sure that social belongs housed in PR for many reasons.  I do, however believe there is value in PR having a social presence and I believe that value will continue to evolve for the better and could re-shape the entire industry as we know it today.

While marketing types whine for control, there is another issue.  Many top marketers do not have any experience in social media.  Some come out of the branding world, some the direct marketing side, others creative.  None of that experience qualifies you for understanding and evolving in social media.  What happens is you get marketers proclaming the best way to use social….who have never used social.  If you don’t understand the medium then it is hard to be as innovative and creative as your customers are being with social.  At that point, you lose relevance.

I think it’s well understood that relevance is key today. With customers, employees, partners and prospects you have to stay relevant.  The question is who is most qualified to run your company’s social strategy?  That is what we posed to Kellye Crane, an award winning, long admired PR professional.  Kellye brings a wealth of experience and is one of those PR innovators who agreed to moderate this discussion for us.  her perspective will be enlightening for sure.  The topic this week and questions will be:

Title: Does Public Relations Get The “Message” in Social Media

Q1:  Has PR become a dirty word in social media?

Q2:  Is there a place for “messaging” on social networks?

Q3:  Can a marketing exec have authority on social media topics without directly participating?

Please join us in this online chat on Tuesday, May 24 at noon ET.  Follow #sm112 from your favorite Twitter client or simply go to our LIVE page at www.hashtagsocialmedia.com/live.  The format will stay the same with the first question starting at noon and a new question coming every 20 minutes at 12:20 and 12:40.

Frenemies: Can PR & Advertising Work Together On Social?

Tuesday, March 1st, 2011

Social Media in many contexts is a bucket term that people use to define the digital unknown.  When marketers, IT and marketing communications come together it becomes difficult to split out social media jobs where they don’t overlap.  Since the digital world became social there has been a land grab of sorts to figure out who owns what when it comes to social media.  On one hand, content heavy side of blogging, tweeting, thought leadership would fall under public relations.  On the other hand, social is an easy bolt on to much of the work that traditional agencies provide their clients.  Agencies typically inlcude more of a technology component simply because they are more set up to do so.

Companies are caught in the middle.  Both pitches sound good.  Without more grounding both could be “right”.  So what is the right approach?  Can you split the duties between the two?  We asked these questions to public relations maven, Elizabeth Sosnow who is the Managing Director at BLISSPR. Elizabeth has a unique spin on this topic that will make for healthy discussion.  We welcome Elizabeth to our 100th week of hosting our weekly chat focused on the Business of Social Media.  Our topic this week and questions are below:

Frenemies: Can PR & Advertising Work together on social?

Q1: Is it realistic to think that Advertising and PR can collaborate on social and what roles should they “own” in a joint pitch?

Q2: Does PR over-rate its capabilities in SM or does it under-rate advertising’s SM potential?

Q3: How many of your current social media campaigns fall into the “promoter” vs. “brand builder” buckets?

Please join us in this online chat on Tuesday, March 1 at noon ET.  Follow #sm100 from your favorite Twitter client or simply go to our LIVE page at www.hashtagsocialmedia.com/live.  The format will stay the same with the first question starting at noon and a new question coming every 20 minutes at 12:20 and 12:40.

The New Digital Press Release

Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010

So who are today’s most effective communicators in business?  Yesterday I might have answered with corporate public relations (PR) when they send our their press release over the wire.  Today though, we have bloggers updating posts and getting thousands or tens of thousands of views in a day.   If you simply changed the title from blogger to corporate PR could you get the same effect?

What’s the value of the traditional press release today?  Press releases that are done in the same fashion as they were 5 years ago are a waste of time and precious resource.  People don’t read that way anymore, there are way too many other releases (blogs) that compete for the same timeshare and press releases that are built for the wire or for the corporate press page on the website will never get seen again.

There are many people beginning to catch on to today’s journalistic requirements and only a handful who started the revolution as much as 4 years ago (Todd Defren, Shift Communictions, has this initial social media press release template available).  And the discussion today has shifted a bit further into push vs. pull styles for PR.  The press release of today is more than a spiffed up template though.  The voice of the release is different, the tone, the content, the target and the media by which to express it is different.  Here are some points to consider in the new digital press release:

  1. concise content – It’s not about crafting a story as it is about feeding quality content
  2. no buzzword bingo – content has to be in the language of the audience not the made up language of the company
  3. Targeted to audiences – much like advanced websites provide me content related to my previous viewing and digital ads can be served up ad hoc in seconds, press releases need to have a message targeted to specific audiences.  It’ possible you write 3 intros to the same release with different angles of the content based on the audience who is viewing it.
  4. multi-media – text is boring, video is cool.  Include images, podcasts, videos, schematics, etc to enhance the content.  I believe we are close to having press releases taking the form of all video very soon (no text).
  5. Make it shareable (referring to point #2, see usually I would say extensible) – provide a 140 character summary and shortened URL on the release, add a Facebook “Like” button, create a focused posterous page, etc.

Today’s world is challenging enough that all parts of the orgnaization need to be operating seemlessly.  Having effective press releases is certainly one of those important pieces of the overall pie.  For proper attribute on the topic, I want to give props to Cyndee Woolley for the idea of this topic and for teeing up this week’s moderator Shel Holtz.  Shel wrote the book on corporate conversations (well five of them actually) and has been speaking and writing on the topic for more than a decade.  Shel will lead the discussion with the following questions:

Topic: The New Digital Press Release

Q1:  What value do you see to a social media news release or a social media
newsroom?

Q2: Are there still uses for the traditional news release?

Q3:  How do you combine traditional media relations with social media?

Please join us in the conversation on Tuesday 6/22  noon Eastern by following #sm65 on twitter or by going to our LIVE page at www.hashtagsocialmedia.com/live.

Aligning the Brand Personality with the Personality of the Individual Representing the Brand

Sunday, September 27th, 2009

The new rules of PR 2.0, something this week’s moderator Brian Solis spends a lot of time with.  Public Relations pros have built their careers being the voice BEHIND the Brand.  Then comes the sociPR20al web.  With the social web, a new age of public relations “faces” are appearing from all over within companies.  Starting their own blogs, taking to Twitter to streamline customer help issues or using Facebook to sell product, these social pioneers are re-defining “Public Relations” in its traditional sense.  They are coming from customer service, product management, research, operations and even the cleaning crew.  This new age of PR pros are taking a different approach from their brethren of past, they are now out in FRONT of the Brand. 

Being in front of the Brand is changing the dynamics of what PR is and does.  Think about this:

  • When you are pushing your message to the public, it creates a sense of trust.  “I don’t have any reason not to believe your soup is now lower in sodium and therefore better for my health, Right?” 
  • It’s not until you engage with that consumer and create a cycle of communication that you begin to get a sense of ownership. “Hey girlfriends, Joe from Soup Co tweeted me with about a new recipe and asked if they should use grilled chicken or roasted for their New & Improved soup coming out next month. We all need to try it”

The difference between old PR and marketing and the new age of PR is significant.  It’s taking the broad messaging back to micro-messaging looking to build their following one happy customer at a time.  So what’s the downside to the new rules of PR 2.0?  Do you gain trust if Susie from marketing is talking to you about the recent drug interactions of your new Pharmaceutical instead of the research PR messaging?  It probably depends where the message is coming from and the sincerity of it that helps to align your feelings of the Brand and where you trust that Brand in the perspective of your family.

So that’s the topic this week, aligning the personalities of your brand and your new breed of “PR” pros.  Carrying the discussion this week is Brian Solis who has been at the head of this discussion since the mid 1990′s.  He is one of the leading voices in this field and will certainly add his share of nuggets into this conversation. 

Aligning the Brand Personality with the Personality of the Individual Representing the Brand

Q1: Who do you trust more? How do you know when the brand is talking or when the person behind the brand is?

Q2:  What happens when the personal Brands become larger than the Brand they represent? How does that affect your loyalty in the brand?

Q3:  Are you more apt to engage in a relationship with the brand, based on the person behind the brand? If that person leaves, do you leave to?

Be sure to join us this Tuesday 9/29 at 12 noon EST for the last #socialmedia event of September.  Either follow #socialmedia on your favorite Twitter client or follow our Live page for a filtered feed of the conversation.