@glfceo @ggheorghiu even when we *know* we are being abused we really don't care sometimes. sucks, but true #Facebook #SM76 #SCRM
@ggheorghiu @glfceo the 'blind eye' of the consumer is very purposeful #SM76 #SCRM
@ggheorghiu @glfceo are those corporate or consumer generated problems though? #SM76 #SCRM
@glfceo to me what needs to be transparent are a companies values not processes/internal/etc. Ask do actions align with brand values? #sm76
@rwang0 many thanks for joining us Ray #sm76 #scrm
@AndrewMueller don't believe the hype :) Good PR move, but below the line P&L? Not so sure #sm76
@AndrewMueller exactly #SCRM #sm76
@AndrewMueller don't believe the hype :) Good PR move, but below the line P&L? Not so sure #sm76
@dan_larkin @ekolsky don't misunderstand me, I *support* transparency, it's just not the end-all be-all it's made out to be #SM76 #SCRM
@mjayliebs don't I know it #sm76
@ekolsky I don't want to see the cow being slaughtered, just give me the burger. #SM76 #SCRM
@ekolsky to me everything is framed in "intent". Everything else is just shades of meaningless gray #SM76
@mjayliebs heh, i already have one somewhere #sm76
@ekolsky Authenticity I can stand behind, transparency is not needed or required #SM76 #SCRM
@AndrewMueller you know I agree with you, yet go try and sell that snack beside the guys in marketing/sales who have an entree #sm76
@themaria these are not small issues #sm76
@themaria u can adjust sure, but requires remapping of metadata, process workflows, possible loss of data u were dependent upon, etc #sm76
@AndrewMueller effectiveness is not the same as efficient. sm customer service is much more expensive #sm76
@AndrewMueller you can certainly put a meter on the tap where one wasn't before :) #sm76
@mjayliebs the bigger challenge (imo) right now is do these diff departments mean same thing when they say "scrm"? #scrm #sm76
@AndrewMueller @mjayliebs definitely the function I would start at, but "revenue" vs "efficiency" wins every time in C suite #SCRM #sm76
@mjayliebs the bigger challenge (imo) right now is do these diff departments mean same thing when they say "scrm"? #scrm #sm76
@rwang0 One primary variable not being discussed is that the SM data sources can be throttled or turned off at any time #scrm #sm76
@mjayliebs Marketing and Sales seem to be two primaries, but IMO it should not be existing departmental effort #scrm #sm76
@ekolsky i agree, and yet are largest segment of what marketplace called 'crm' #SM76 #SCRM
@rwang0 my concern w/ traditional CRM enhancements is that existing deployments are Sales focused and workflows for #scrm follow suit #sm76
@rwang0 is 'Punked' the formal analytical term for it now? :) #crm #scrm #sm76
@rwang0 are you seeing pushback on scrm from the C level due to high % of failed past crm deployments? #scrm #sm76
@rwang0 yet we need cultural shift to where they get job done in way that works best for *customer*. #scrm #sm76
RT @mjayliebs: #scrm is 20% tech, the rest is hard work, strategy and planning (HT - @ekolsky) #sm76
@rwang0 Baseline methodologies/workflow, exposed hooks, naming of metadata structures, cloud security protocols, all needed #sm76 #scrm #5ms
@rwang0 on the middleware front, do you see standardization of API's, etc. as we move forward to facilitate this? #sm76 #scrm #5ms
@rwang0 and the enhanced data collection/reporting can spread across silos where it wouldn't have before #sm76 #scrm #5ms
@chuckhemann be careful, your mother may not like the influence I can put on you :P #sm75
@Marc_Meyer wow, thanks Marc #sm75
@chuckhemann and in biz world it was this guy (article is on exactly this topic) http://bit.ly/cccu2H #sm75
@chuckhemann My, now passed away, great aunt http://bit.ly/dq1c7g #sm75
@tamadear duh, I'll take my staff and kickass magic, you can go do monotonous paperwork all day #sm75
@KseniaCoffman which is also influence...yet wasn't measured #sm75
@chuckhemann that was me as well :P #sm75
@KellyeCrane some of us are kings, some of us are king-makers :) #sm75
@chuckhemann @tamadear which is what I mean by 'long term" influence. Abuse of influence leads to less of it #sm75
@KellyeCrane preach it sister #sm75
@AppleBoxStudios well, there is that #sm75
@TomMartin @chuckhemann yet that makes it no less a measure of influence, just not very qualitative #sm75
@ckieff IMO most objected inherently to notion of saying "you're *not* popular enough to spread your qualitative influence" #sm75
@chuckhemann remember, I'm influence purist. you want me to click on link, I click, you influenced me #sm75
@chuckhemann I was fine with it, it *was* a measure of influence, just not of influence "quality" #sm75
@chuckhemann I was fine with it, it *was* a measure of influence, just not of influence "quality" #sm75
@chuckhemann what they didn't do well is understand the emotional backlash of making an audience feel excluded :) #sm75
@tamadear it's all about knowing the context of the algorithms. (didn't someone just write an article on importance of context?) :P #sm75
@chuckhemann Lots of mention about 'klout score' here. The value is in the analysis that makes up the score, not the score itself. #sm75
@themaria I would reword that to say "..can't be measured in financially feasible way" :) #sm75
@chuckhemann human factor important for other reasons too (perhaps primary influencer targets are oversaturated, unreachable) #sm75
@ckieff Dude, Obama knows his bikes :P #sm75
@chuckhemann meaning that they have less influence reach, but more depth #sm75
@chuckhemann An example: I give priority in certain programs to influencers who are 'long term' (high quality) influencers #sm75
@AppleBoxStudios not necessarily, I did a study once where I had a "fickle" bucket for some influencers :) #sm75
@chuckhemann the tougher, but more important piece IMO, is measuring the 'quality' of someones influence #sm75
@themaria also not tied just to your follower #'s, but how influential your followers are (reach) #sm75
@chuckhemann I think this is the part of the program where we narrow context to our digital marketing realm :) #sm75
@ckieff a good point #sm75
@chuckhemann i.e. cause of action or thought. both measurable #sm75
@chuckhemann I'm a bit of a purist when it comes to influence' #sm75
@ckieff apparently you'd argue with a wall :) (j/k) #sm75
@ckieff apparently you'd argue with a wall :) (j/k) #sm75
@ckieff the guy with a knife to your throat is plenty influential :) #sm75
@ckieff many many dictators, etc #sm75
@AppleBoxStudios @ckieff so Saddam wasn't influential #sm75
@chuckhemann yes, to some degree. might be easier to look at other end, plenty of *unpopular* ppl w/ huge influence #sm75
@chuckhemann but just b/c you can use popularity *for* influence doesn't make them equivalent #sm75
@chuckhemann popularity is a measure of emotion. u can influence with or without it #sm75
@chuckhemann to me influence is pretty straightforward, ability to make someone think or take action #sm75
@Marc_Meyer hope it went well, marathon morning of phone calls today, sorry I missed it #socialmedia #sm74
@SRStran Here's proper link to that ROI presentation along w/ worksheets that I promised. http://ow.ly/2qUJg #sm73
@autom8 I react so strongly to the ROI dialog b/c it's generally a cop-out to make it a soft measure when it has a specific meaning #sm73
@nigellegg Think? You ask far too much of me sir #sm73
@SRStran Here's a version of him giving that presentation: http://www.viddler.com/explore/courane01/videos/11/ #sm73
@SRStran @cspenn has a good presentation on ROI that might be helpful, i'll see if i can find it. #sm73
@SRStran only if you translate all factors into a monetary value #sm73
@autom8 Yes, they could, and it's counter-productive #sm73
@RobertNCroft Or in case of a volunteer example for labor. Investment costs of recruiting - zero cost of labor = ROI #sm73
@RobertNCroft to put it a diff way: Relationships are only valuable (to npo) if they lead to conversion. Conversion is a money factor. #sm73
@RobertNCroft just call it something else. I'm not diminishing importance of other factors, simply stating ROI is what it is. #sm73
@SRStran That's the "whuffie" factor (social capital), but it's a reciprocal equation and irrelevant to ROI #sm73
@ajmunn yes, ROI *must* equate to money. It's a financial equation. Soft measures like branding/awareness/influence r fine.but not ROI #sm73
@e_philanthropy no matter what you do, end of the day you either have a positive investment, or you fail, period. #sm73
@e_philanthropy Sorry, but I can't buy into that. ROI is still ROI. Branding and awareness is fine, but its not ROI #sm73
@jsandford Could not agree more. Make it simple for others to find, create, and tell the stories associated w/ the cause. #sm73
@TomMartin Exactamundo #sm73
@TomMartin Exactamundo #sm73
@kanter The 3 N's of Advocate Mgmt: Nurture, nurture, nurture #sm73
@kanter same goes for calls for volunteers (linkages to powerful personal stories, etc. w/ signups and opportunities to contribute) #sm73
@kanter same goes for calls for volunteers (linkages to powerful personal stories, etc. w/ signups and opportunities to contribute) #sm73
@kanter produce simple messaging snippets with calls to action to one-click contribution pages and distribute to advocates. #sm73
@kanter You don't really have to look much further than Charity:Water for a social media model of success. #sm73
@kanter You don't really have to look much further than Charity:Water for a social media model of success. #sm73
@CoryOBrien to some degree yes, they are. (only so much money to go around). #sm73
@CoryOBrien to some degree yes, they are. (only so much money to go around). #sm73
@kanter The 'influencer' effect is huge with a non-profit. "x influencer just contributed, I will contribute to be seen by influencer" #sm73
@CoryOBrien The big Q: Given the nature of SM, will causes for a specific individual or for a non-profit fare better over time? #sm73
@CoryOBrien Non-profits have built in advocacy programs...a primary key to social media success, and advantage over trad. biz #sm73
@kanter The flip-side is saturation, so many "causes" on SM these days are outside of non-profits (individual issues) #sm73
@kanter The flip-side is saturation, so many "causes" on SM these days are outside of non-profits (individual issues) #sm73
@kanter of course it can help provide impact. The personalization of a cause through storytelling in particular. #sm73
@Marc_Meyer see Marc, you've already broken twitter #sm73
@EAv_Squirrel I guess my point is that I'm not of the mind that we must "create" good CM's out of other role. Communities arent new. #sm72
@cbensen Advocate creation and nurturing. Period. You cannot scale without. #sm72
@EAv_Squirrel except it's not just about 'issues'. sales/promotion/mkt/development/content creation/cross-departmental politics/etc #sm72
@cbensen re: the "which is more important" statements. Why imply that you should settle for less than all skills/attributes? #sm72
@cbensen Q3: Yes. But depending on where curation is happening they may already control it. #sm72
@KathyHerrmann not sure how you got impression i'm anti-measurement (it's part of what i do). u wanted ex. of when *not* 2 measure #sm71
@KathyHerrmann so even if it makes no logical sense to try and measure some specific activity they should do it anyway? lost #sm71
@tomob i would hope so, since sentiment analysis can only be done accurately enough manually (thus low samples) #sm71
@KathyHerrmann b/c if the cost of measurement outweighs any potential benefit of the results it's fiscally dumb #sm71
@tomob well, perhaps not straightline representation, but you can build adjustment factors #sm71
@nigellegg many times data is simply a comfort/defensive measure, no real actionable purpose. be clear on what you wld do with results #sm71
@andrewmueller @KathyHerrmann to be contrarian, sometimes the question *is* whether to measure #sm71
@tomob to establish a correlation build a baseline first #sm71
@Marc_Meyer speak for yourself, i had primary office in UK, I spell it 'wrong' all the time #sm71
@Marc_Meyer speak for yourself, i had primary office in UK, I spell it 'wrong' all the time #sm71
@iMediaMichelle if we were smart we'd build a call center w/ sm expertise and sel to enterprises :P #smchat #sm71
@Marc_Meyer :) I think we wrote half of those didn't we? #sm71
@techguerilla more than half of all call centers are outsourced anyway #sm71
@iMediaMichelle that they now have to conduct themselves out in the open and have impact on brand. its big deal #sm71
@iMediaMichelle most def. however, not so simple. try telling call center rep 2 have more responsibility at all levels w/ no extra pay #sm71
@iMediaMichelle e.g. I'm certainly not putting a call center or online chat script reading flunky in a SM forum #sm71
@iMediaMichelle financially the prob isn't the medium, its the higher cost skillsets required to work in the medium #sm71
@CASUDI @iMediaMichelle the "fluffy" stuff that makes so much sense at entrepreneurial level just doesn't fly. #sm71
@CASUDI @iMediaMichelle no doubt. I work with multiple startups. completely diff animal #sm71
@CASUDI @iMediaMichelle it's one reason why we've built new structures for integrating SM throughout but rollup to umbrella group #sm71
@CASUDI @iMediaMichelle e.g. At one enterprise client I'm increasing sales via mktg, increasing costs via CS. Mgmt is struggling #sm71
@CASUDI @iMediaMichelle Hard to say at this point. Part of it is getting orgs to correlate budgeting across silos #sm71
@iMediaMichelle my big question is still whether you are willing to *pay* (higher product prices, etc) to fund that monitoring? #sm71
@GetResults that and much more #sm71
@KathyHerrmann that's a good example #sm71
@Liz_Money 100% agree, sort of (regardless of 'social' or not, I engaged w/ them closely in nashville flood) #Sm71
@Marketwire I'd say we have diff definitions of social. Is it just interaction? #sm71
@Marketwire give me an example of truly "social" engagement from a large corp. offline? #sm71
@iMediaMichelle "social" engagement offline is virtually irrelevant for many large enterprises (social is key word here) #sm71
@whatsnext do you pay more for their products/services so that they can fund that staff? #sm71
@whatsnext point is that I don't care if most GiantCorp engages socially offline, but I do online #sm71
@Marc_Meyer @whatsnext e.g. Do I care that Pepsi isn't engaging w/ me socially offline? No #sm71
@Marc_Meyer @whatsnext i think this is partially dependent upon size of org. #sm71
@cariofthevalley i have a (very large) integration structure for enterprises that deals w/ that, but you're right #sm71
@whatsnext @MarcMeyer greenpeace even #sm71
@whatsnext @MarcMeyer tell greenpeach that #sm71
@Marc_Meyer late to the show, trying to catch up, what's current Q? #sm71
@ambercleveland ha, that's pretty cool #sm70
@milesd999 given the expense of each one, i'd say you don't :P #sm70
@denvan for the record, @jaybaer has the coolest biz card ever #justsayin #sm70
@djwaldow anytime, especially if ur buying :) #sm70
@jaybaer @marc_meyer @jasonbreed keep on rockin in the free world guys, thx for the convo #sm70
@TomMartin @djwaldow @jaybaer would i have to consider myself a blogger to attend? :P #sm70
@TomMartin once you've humanized the connection detractors will evolve #sm70
@TomMartin in my experience, nothing converts detractors like face2face / voice2voice. ppl are diff without the audience #sm70
@jaybaer @djwaldow most def, the theoretical "SAMS" system includes adding a larger speaker to advocates microphone #sm70
@TomMartin @jaybaer @djwaldow and yet so little attn is paid to psychological risk mitigation techniques #sm70
@djwaldow @jaybaer i.e. I don't need 2 "convert" an influencer 2 an advocate, I just need to leverage the advocates that r influencers #sm70
@djwaldow @jaybaer For me influence (at brand level) is about advocates and the nurturing of them. #sm70
@jaybaer that's pretty perfect actually :P #sm70
@jaybaer i have a structure for it based on a "SAMS" 'social advocate management system' post i did, i'll write you one #sm70
@jaybaer i have a structure for it based on a "SAMS" 'social advocate management system' post i did, i'll write you one #sm70
@mjayliebs like? #sm70
@djwaldow influence upon *your* brand is not subjective. if @jaybaer preaches about my product, i care...a lot #sm70
@mjayliebs completely disagree, "fair" unfortunately doesn't work where influence is concerned #sm70
@jaybaer I think the sales funnel will eventually evolve to the "advocate funnel" in SM. #sm70
@jaybaer I think the sales funnel will eventually evolve to the "advocate funnel" in SM. #sm70
@jaybaer but in general, think of how majority of call centers are outsourced. whose voice is that? #sm70
@jaybaer things requiring tiered, system based, support are difficult to outsource in any forum #sm70
@jaybaer things requiring tiered, system based, support are difficult to outsource in any forum #sm70
@jaybaer things requiring tiered, system based, support are difficult to outsource in any forum #sm70
@jaybaer Then there are folks like Charter Cable in which customer service would never work externally #sm70
@jaybaer depends on structure you're used to I suppose. I have folks sitting at client location for example #sm70
@jaybaer why better/worse at monitoring? #sm70
@dj_justjay noone is saying "don't do it yourself", I'm saying it's perfectly fine if you don't want to to outsource it #sm70
@themaria my thoughts on that subject http://bit.ly/9P7kng #sm70
@dj_justjay because maybe you suck at it or can't deliver. do ur employees do your tv commercials? #sm70
@jaybaer I think you know my strong feelings on that topic :) http://bit.ly/9P7kng #sm70
@iMediaMichelle An unknown quantity is better than a known lousy quantity #sm70
@iMediaMichelle Of course, but if they have a website from 1996 that hasn't been updated which is worse? #sm70
@jaybaer Q2: Scalability, silo confusion, risk exposure, etc. #sm70
@GetResults makes no diff, manage expectations to where you can overdeliver not underdeliver #sm70
@themaria err, against a company, not against a customer, you get the point #sm70
@themaria right now you get bonus points for being on, but it doesn't mean you get negative for being off #sm70
@themaria why awful to not find on twitter? u rlly thinki customers (at this point) hold that against a customer? #sm70
@themaria Q: If you have issue, find corp on twitter, ask question, get no response. Better or worse than not finding them? #sm70
@EdHartigan For many biz it's simply not an effective expenditure of effort, nor will ever be #sm70
@trimblyton Setting expectation and failing is worse than not showing up to the party at all #sm70
@EdHartigan For many biz it's simply not an effective expenditure of effort, nor will ever be #sm70
@jaybaer Secondly, and I realize not popular opinion, but SM just isn't right for all businesses #sm70
@ar_turnbull in a "response" situation it's engaging, but it's not a true dialog. still monologue based #sm70
@jaybaer specifically, there's a lot of "push" responses going on right now via monitoring w/ no followthrough ability #sm70
@jaybaer by that I mean creating an expectation that it cannot deliver on thus doing more harm than good #sm70
@jaybaer by that I mean creating an expectation that it cannot deliver on thus doing more harm than good #sm70
@jaybaer When it isn't prepared to be responsive... #sm70
@iMediaMichelle @adamcohen yeah, don't forget Guerilla ;) #SM69
@Marc_Meyer how was it today btw? meeting went long and couldn't join in #socialmedia #sm69
@Marc_Meyer @theblackfin bummed i wont be there, but it should make it a less bumpy ride 4 everyone else :P #socialmedia #sm68
@GetResults that's why i say an opt-in consolidated infrastructure is way to go (you're already trackable, Q is who has info) #sm62
@jakrose in other words, the carrier can determine location for any cellular device..only a smartphone can give it otherwise #sm62
@jakrose but it requires the carrier to determine location unless using gps, so only so much google can do #sm62
@jakrose gps is highly preferred over triangulation, but is a long time until all devices have that capability #sm62
@jakrose but it requires the carrier to determine location unless using gps, so only so much google can do #sm62
@jakrose carriers would essentially be the "adsense" of LBS #sm62
@jakrose requires carriers to implement, and they'd be idiots not to #sm62
@jakrose i see an underlying opt-in infrastructure that services can tap into like ad network *or* apps can leverage #sm62
@jakrose the 4sq of the world are really driven reactively (we say where we are) not proactively. proactive is deeper than 'app' #sm62
@jakrose Think "walk past location, receive text msg with coupon, interest point info, etc.". not 'app driven' #sm62
@jakrose Both. Eventually we'll migrate to non-active app based push LBS much like an ad platform. #sm62
@jakrose They'll need carriers to establish & manage a LBS opt-in system and integrate to it. #sm62
@jakrose They'll need carriers to establish & manage a LBS opt-in system and integrate to it. #sm62
@Marc_Meyer thanks to@marc_meyer @lucretiapruitt and @jasonbreed for another interesting chat #sm61
@karimacatherine errr, you flatter me my dear #sm61
@lucretiapruitt more importantly, they were able to communicate at both ends (biz + legal dept) effectively #sm61
@lucretiapruitt best lawyers i've worked with were ex-lawyers who became CFO's, etc. They found balance btw biz need & risk mitigation #sm61
@lucretiapruitt many times the legal involvement is not to restrict actions, it's to protect yourself *after* you ignore them :) #sm61
@J_Fuji uneducated mgmt can still make fast (but stupid) decisions :) #sm61
@lucretiapruitt but reason it's almost always accepted is b/c mgmt. doesn't want the liability of not taking their advice #sm61
@lucretiapruitt legal never technically 'signs off'. they submit revisions and recommendations. mgmt. must decide #sm61
@elhoust by implication that means i cannot spot risks without truly understanding a medium. at legal level i disagree #sm #sm61
@ckieff with Nestle I'd challenge someone to show the material effect holding comments for 5 days had #sm61
@RepuTrack not necessarily (see corporate forums as example). its just that real time and volume of participation changes the game #sm61
@lucretiapruitt biggest scare for lawyers at moment is lack of case law imo #sm61
@lucretiapruitt biggest scare for lawyers at moment is lack of case law imo #sm61
@LucretiaPruitt somewhat. but real world analogies come into play more than experience with the tools #sm61
@Marc_Meyer sigh, hipaa :) #sm61
@lucretiapruitt 4 example, i spent 3 hours with privacy lawyer last wk on twitter & hippaa. he's never used it #sm61
@lucretiapruitt e.g. Twitter becomes "standing on a stage with a bullhorn". I don't need to use it to now mitigate #sm61
@lucretiapruitt it speeds the process of them understanding the premise, but usage is not really required #sm61
@JohnFMoore not really, it can help legal understand your premise, but the laws don't change #sm #sm61
@jasonbreed exactly #sm61
@JohnFMoore disagree, legal is risk mitigation, period. biz needs don't apply, u have to override legal and accept risk if desired #sm61
@hurriednotes @LucretiaPruitt I'm your agency, I tell a customer to F off. You fire me and say unacceptable, not your views, etc #sm61
@lucretiapruitt can't name names, but one client is discussing 3rd party comm. to provide protective distance (disavow) #sm61
@lucretiapruitt bottom line is that legal wants intermediary function. how to incorporate in SM world? #sm61
@lucretiapruitt thats kind of the problem, the rules have changed to meet our litigious society..thus legal slowdown #sm61
@lucretiapruitt Yet we cannot ask legal to not uphold its mission. Balance is required #sm61
@lucretiapruitt Yet we cannot ask legal to not uphold its mission. Balance is required #sm61
"Quick" and "Genuine" are antithesis of how legal dept. wants you to respond/act, yet SM requires it #sm61
@kseniacoffman Q is how you go about it, you cannot sustain a biz long term without a customer focus. #sm60
@McKeenMatt many thx #sm60
@kseniacoffman @conniereece it's about trust, not biz model. zuckerberg is on record as saying he wants to take your privacy away #sm60
@conniereece the overriding topic will lead here: http://bit.ly/9ZGXrj would love 4 u to fill out survey #sm60
@conniereece The CFO and other C-level have often caveated end of statements with "this is what mark believes, i'm not so sure" #sm60
@nigellegg i completely understand. prob i have is saying it's ok for someone to actively F##$ me and still do biz with them #sm60
@conniereece i think its only way to re-establish trust in a short timeframe, and they don't want this crack open long #sm60
@conniereece i do actually, but i haven't investigated his % shares and BOD status which would effect that if he resisted #sm60
@nigellegg this convo is definitely helping to prepare me for my big debate on this Thu. so i appreciate the opposite view #sm60
@nigellegg there is also a mashable link ther for the opposing view which u seem to share #sm60
@nigellegg C ths post 4 my full opinion on that http://socialfresh.com/in-defense-of-facebook-a-response/ #sm60
@jdlasica Fast and furious, but you hung in there :) good chat #sm60
@shelisrael glad to see you back up and around my friend #sm60
@nigellegg Q is what is "responsible"? I define it as being responsible within a reasonable framework of risk and trust #sm60
@nigellegg Q is what is "responsible"? I define it as being responsible within a reasonable framework of risk and trust #sm60
@shelisrael now we do it for sheer apathy #sm60
@jdlasica there's a great article out there by @jasonfried you should read on diaspora, i completely agree with it #sm60
@RaineyReitman Privacy will become the new competitive differentiator #Privacy #sm60
@wendykenney I'd show grandma, unless she was a 2-faced hussy who then broadcast it on national news #sm60
@wendykenney I'd show grandma, unless she was a 2-faced hussy who then broadcast it on national news #sm60
@shelisrael i don't blame them, what a trainwreck that'd be. #SM60
@conniereece diaspora will never leave the ground #sm60
@jameswester that they are doing this for your benefit #sm60
@colinzammit no, it's not. #sm60
@karimacatherine pls explain diff. FB sets expectation that something is private, then exposes. What wld be diff in dM? #sm60
@jameswester that's laughable, truly. #sm60
@andrewmueller you have to HAVE values before you can state them #sm60
@RaineyReitman they do abide by their word. today. then diff word tommorow. then... #sm60
@karimacatherine wrong, i determined my info was private, FB then determined they wanted it public. what's diff? #sm60
@McKeenMatt but that logic doesn't work. You can also control whether you use a service, u don't, security no problem #SM60
@karimacatherine so disclosing all of your DM's would be cool with you? No right to complain right? #sm60
@karimacatherine so my bank should change its privacy rules and sell my data? "social" doesn't change anything #sm60
@jdlasica "Privacy is dead" Facebook CEO #sm60
@CoryOBrien My privacy or my Farmville crops? ack. tough decision #SM60
@ikepigott @shelholtz fyi, studies have shown that younger gen is actually more concerned than old fogies #shocker #sm60
@karimacatherine so email, banking, ecomm, all are out huh? no internet anymore? #sm60
@karimacatherine so email, banking, ecomm, all are out huh? no internet anymore? #sm60
@jsandford it's different b/c of level of interaction. how many wal marts to you shop at 5hrs a day? #sm60
@ikepigott heh, is basically a direct quote from my article, so i'm in favor of it :) #sm60
@karimacatherine they should be responsible "within a reasonable framework of trust and risk" #sm60
@CoryOBrien ur implication is that we *need* to change our comfort level w/ our lack of privacy #SM60
@jsandford no. #sm60
@hurriednotes i don't care about transparency, i DO care about authenticity however #sm60
@jsandford b/c it's not a single company they interface with looking them in the eye saying F U #sm60
@CoryOBrien funny most ppl think these overreaches are accidents. u overreach so that when pull back u are still further along #SM60
@jsandford how is that relevant? #sm60
@jaimeenapp issue isn't your expectations, it's that those reasonable expectations are being abused..blatantly #facebook #sm60
@jaimeenapp issue isn't your expectations, it's that those reasonable expectations are being abused..blatantly #facebook #sm60
@shelisrael as always Shel is on top of it, even after surgery #SM60
@johnhaydon when ur CEO says he wants a privacy free utopia, u have to figure out if you're on board with that #sm60
@conniereece simple Q. if another service could import your FB data and still allow you to post/receive status' to FB, would u leave? #sm60
@conniereece simple Q. if another service could import your FB data and still allow you to post/receive status' to FB, would u leave? #sm60
@CoryOBrien they are one and the same, one is simply a tactic to accomplish the stratgy #SM60
@CoryOBrien and you don't find that purposeful? they need to release ur data, so they simply add more controls to override it.. #SM60
@conniereece i'm in debate on this topic Thurs...sold out faster than any previous event, ppl are perking up #sm60
@conniereece i'm in debate on this topic Thurs...sold out faster than any previous event, ppl are perking up #sm60
@CoryOBrien if they wanted u to really have more granular control they would not override your previous selections #SM60
@conniereece they promised u certain data was private, then just changed the rules, why diff in future? #sm60
@McKeenMatt 2 me security & privacy are inexorably intertwined #SM60
@CoryOBrien it's confusing on purpose, that's kind of the point #SM60
@CoryOBrien it's confusing on purpose, that's kind of the point #SM60
@jdlasica It's about "intent". They have purposefully tried to circumvent users privacy. That's too far #sm60
@jdlasica Yes. {that may be shortest answer i've ever given} #sm60
@Marc_Meyer timely no? http://socialfresh.com/in-defense-of-facebook-a-response/ #socialmedia #sm60
@jaffejuice it's got a very Geoffrey Moore feel to it, (that's a compliment from my perspective) #sm59
@jaffejuice ahh, so you didn't replace the metaphor, you extended it. got it. i like it #sm59
@jaffejuice havent read book. how do you deal with the chicken/egg issue of a flipped funnel? #flipthefunnel #sm59
@Marc_Meyer @jasonbreed @jaffejuice thx for good convo today #socialmedia #sm59 #sm60
@danperezfilms @themaria if it's a marketing objective absolutely. #sm #sm59
@KathyHerrmann ROI is a post measurement activity. U can't do it until it's over. #sm59
@KathyHerrmann @andrewmueller Q isn't whether ROI is important, it's what are the objectives? Ad/PR/Mktg/CS ? #sm59
@andrewmueller @JohnFMoore what is the ROI of taking that exec out to dinner? #sm59
@MikeFraietta @JohnFMoore I'm a big believer that you can't do both at once (efficiencies vs growth) #sm59
@stepmorgan i've been struggling with exactly that question. i think it's a variant on this http://bit.ly/ch1X4J #sm59
@jaffejuice let's face it, not everyone is equipped to understand the nuances of PR, liability, etc. #sm59
@jaffejuice also the Q has to be dealt with in regards to whether they represent the *official* face of the company #sm59
@ActiveIngreds me too, but i've heard variants of it from @jaybaer and others, not my original verbiage #sm59
@jaffejuice would seem you'd almost have to build a class system? #sm59
@jaffejuice would seem you'd almost have to build a class system? #sm59
@cariofthevalley @jaffejuice how about removing SM from the proposal, treat it like any other "opportunity" #sm59
@jaffejuice extremely conflicted with Q3, desperately trying to get my arms around it #sm59
@sharonmostyn @jasonbreed In short, what matters is value. Low quality products might have gr8 value, it's own form of value branding #sm59
@jaffejuice the ability for large companies to "act small" has never been greater #sm59
@Marc_Meyer they have succeeded, whether they continue to evolve is up to them :) #sm59
@jaffejuice Look at 4sq. Very little actual value. But worthless badges build incentive. #sm59
@jaffejuice: Q2: the $1M question :) Tiered recognition works wonders #sm59
@stepmorgan no offense, but that's naive. employees already have job functions. where does time come from? #sm59
@AndrewMueller there is scrm as a concept outside of tools/platforms, and scrm as a toolset. we r still debating that topic #sm59
@jaffejuice @karimacatherine i use diff terminology but same concept, I see it as the new "conversion" process #sm59
@StephanieSAM @jaffejuice there is audience focused automation, and then there is solely efficiency focused. the latter needs 2 die #sm59
@andrewmueller @jaffejuice i.e. A advocate is a customer for most part, but a customer is not necessarily an advocate #sm59
@stepmorgan no offense, but that's naive. employees already have job functions. where does time come from? #sm59
@AndrewMueller there is scrm as a concept outside of tools/platforms, and scrm as a toolset. we r still debating that topic #sm59
@jaffejuice @karimacatherine i use diff terminology but same concept, I see it as the new "conversion" process #sm59
@jaffejuice: Q2: the $1M question :) Tiered recognition works wonders #sm59
@andrewmueller @jaffejuice I *think* Andrew is talking about advocacy importance in this form? http://bit.ly/ch1X4J (andrew?) #sm59
@AndrewMueller google group #sm59
@stepmorgan 100% agree, but existing CS models are built around scripted automation, tiered support, etc. How do u manage budget? #sm59
@StephanieSAM link to scrm pioneers here http://bit.ly/brH7sR #sm59
@StephanieSAM that's involved & debated Q. check group i'm in over at Social CRM Pioneers that @jowyang created #sm59
@andrewmueller @jaffejuice I *think* Andrew is talking about advocacy importance in this form? http://bit.ly/ch1X4J (andrew?) #sm59
@stepmorgan and then go out of business b/c you have no more profit #sm59
@AndrewMueller google group #sm59
@stepmorgan 100% agree, but existing CS models are built around scripted automation, tiered support, etc. How do u manage budget? #sm59
@StephanieSAM link to scrm pioneers here http://bit.ly/brH7sR #sm59
@StephanieSAM that's involved & debated Q. check group i'm in over at Social CRM Pioneers that @jowyang created #sm59
@jaffejuice scrm will help for a while, but then will bcome facilitator of non audience focused "efficiencies" #sm59
@jaffejuice exactly. #sm59
@jaffejuice 1-Yes, 2-Only if scalable models r discovered, 3-YES :) #flipthefunnel #sm59
@jaffejuice sorry, i can't understand you with that accent :P #sm59
@karimacatherine @marc_meyer @RichardatDELL since i convert my clients to 100% Dell, I guess u could say I think they're high quality #sm58
@andrewmueller @themaria The Harley brand is a lifestyle, not a product #sm58
@AndrewMueller @karimacatherine I'd be happy to put on my Inspector Cluesoe accent #sm58
@Marc_Meyer unless you're these guys, then its cool http://bit.ly/18yN0H #sm58
@andrewmueller i keep finding all of these tweets that aren't in the #sm58 stream
@AndrewMueller I was talking about me, but if the shoe fits... #sm58
@AndrewMueller I just imagine everything she says in a french accent, makes it very enjoyable :) #sm58
@AndrewMueller could pick apart the semantics of this statement "the brand echos the customers" if i want 2 b controversial #sm58
@AndrewMueller k, let me analyze your stream, i'm sure there's something i can disagree with ...one sec :) #sm58
@karimacatherine i have long conversations with the ppl in charge of those programs, that count? :) #sm58
@karimacatherine today CS in SM is great b/c of ratio, level of skill/empowerment, etc. Cost per incident is many multiples #sm58
@ckieff heh, i know @shawnmcpike , u should send him ur link #sm58
@karimacatherine never said it would be only purpose. only that benefits of CS in SM as its done today will be lost due to scale #sm58
@karimacatherine It's not a financially viable model #sm58
@karimacatherine Just that. CS in social media as it is done today will not scale effectively. It can't #sm58
@karimacatherine @kyleplacy CS in SM today is more a PR exercise than the future. It cannot scale as it is #sm58
@randygiusto u can't separate pricing, market saturation, biz functionality, etc. from branding/marketing. all one beast #sm58
@ckieff i was there, and in 1984 when Apple was already kicking MS ass in branding. doesn't hold water #sm58
@ckieff b/c u happen to disagree with something doesn't mean the majority don't resonate with the product & message #sm58
@ckieff u think MS has better marketing than Apple? Seriously? #sm58
@techguerilla heart even #sm58
@kyleplacy i do biz on 100% referral, so this topic is near and dear to my heard :) #sm58
@kyleplacy Q3: killer product or nothing else matters. u can polish a turd but it's still a turd #sm58
@kyleplacy if u trust me, and i take u by the hand and lead u to giant corp to buy, it's now personal #sm58
@kyleplacy it's not who the end seller is, it's how you arrive at their door. individualize the brand #sm58
@ActiveIngreds it's totally spin IMO, that's why I said "perceptually" :) #sm58
@kyleplacy ppl want to buy from ppl, not giant corp.'s. stories personalize the marketing experience to achieve that effect #sm58
@kyleplacy storytelling telling is todays clift notes for a case study #sm58
@kyleplacy no, storytelling has built in trust component, whereas spin has builtin mistrust #sm58
@kyleplacy I'd argue that storytelling is based in reality (perceptually) whereas messaging is spin. Built in trust. #sm58
@kyleplacy I'd argue that storytelling is based in reality (perceptually) whereas messaging is spin. Built in trust. #sm58
@ckieff make no mistake, u def want to *convert* lurkers where possible. but it's a pull activity, not push #sm58
@ckieff but if you look at history of *marketing* all we measure are those engaged #sm58
@ckieff If I convert 80 out of 100 of those who engage, and 3 out of 100 of those who don't where do I focus? #sm58
@ckieff 1) an audience does not equal a sale #sm58
@kyleplacy essentially first education tier is teaching the "FAQ" so that when new user shows up they can engage with their basic Q #sm58
@kyleplacy educate them to speak on brand/product while providing carrot of recognition #sm58
@kyleplacy certainly, "A did you know?" series of content (prod./brand knowledge) w/ content on benefits of recognition tiers #sm58
@kyleplacy another tier is simply education, ppl lurk to learn or lack confidence, educate them to cross that barrier #sm58
@kyleplacy another tier of that is on support side, it will not scale in SM without an advocacy program #sm58
@kyleplacy people want to feel like they are special, there's a reason all these 4sq "badges" exist :) #sm58
@kyleplacy A tiered recognition program would be one method #socialmedia #sm58
@Marc_Meyer so you want a "specific generalist" :P #sm57
@JoeCascio that doesn't mean your company is cold and exploitive, only the end objective #sm57
@JoeCascio In a sense it is exactly "cold and exploitive". It's business. #sm57
@JoeCascio that doesn't mean your company is cold and exploitive, only the end objective #sm57
@AmberCadabra The challenge I personally find is where to define measurement breakpoints when ur not doing campaign orientation #sm57
@karimacatherine it's why team/agency style selling is necessary. Selling only SM programs is like selling a car without wheels. #sm57
@karimacatherine it can work in practice (it DOES work in practice) but definitely a sea change in thinking #sm57
@AndrewMueller put more simply, the "mix" is fluid to me as an ongoing relationship changes the ratios over time #sm57
@nigellegg of course, but the relationship drives the right mix not an arbitrary budget split #sm57
@AndrewMueller all i see is a palette (tv/adv/sm/etc) to choose from with which to paint the relationship #sm57
@AndrewMueller and I don't mean that in a kumbaya kind of way, tactically, in the real world #sm57
@AndrewMueller I build programs in terms of relationships not budget mixes. #sm57
@AmberCadabra One thing that does change however is the notion of "mix" (campaign oriented) vs. ongoing (relationship oriented) #sm57
@ambercadabra Q3: Better answer is to be proficient in the various mediums to know enough to determine the proper mix #sm57
@AmberCadabra Q3: I refuse to answer on the grounds that it doesn't deserve one :P #sm57
@ambercadabra Q3: Better answer is to be proficient in the various mediums to know enough to determine the proper mix #sm57
@AmberCadabra Q3: I refuse to answer on the grounds that it doesn't deserve one :P #sm57
@AmberCadabra One thing that does change however is the notion of "mix" (campaign oriented) vs. ongoing (relationship oriented) #sm57
@AndrewMueller I build programs in terms of relationships not budget mixes. #sm57
@AmberCadabra grrr, sorry gang, "update limit reached" delaying tweets #sm57
@AmberCadabra Whereas the more amorphous (Adv/PR/Etc) are about creating potential (but inherently less measureable) #sm57
@AmberCadabra Whereas the more amorphous (Adv/PR/Etc) are about creating potential (but inherently less measureable) #sm57
@AmberCadabra In general marketing is about realizing potential. (call to action) #sm57
@AmberCadabra In general marketing is about realizing potential. (call to action) #sm57
@AmberCadabra I'm all for trying to measure everything. But def of marketing is getting pretty muddied here #sm57
@AmberCadabra I'm all for trying to measure everything. But def of marketing is getting pretty muddied here #sm57
@paulgailey You're a gentleman and a scholar good sir #sm56
@correlationist always a pleasure #sm56
@Marc_Meyer @treypennington @ambercadabra Beware of zombies, I predict collateral damage #sm56 #sm57 #socialmedia
@MrAkashSharma Strategies are objective based IMO. Social Media isn't an objective, it's a means to reaching one #sm56
@MrAkashSharma I think my phone is a fantastic tool for a variety of activities, I just don't think it's a strategy #sm56
@AndrewMueller I just feel we make it so difficult on ourselves by trying to make SM so unique, and require *so* much change #sm56
@AndrewMueller execs will buy something they feel is contained. let it prove itself. then they'll let you tear down the fences #sm56
@AndrewMueller I just disagree that we should b in boardrooms "selling" SM. Sell something specific, not generic #sm56
@andrewmueller u've known me long enuff to know I'm a "prove it" guy. I love ROI and justification. #sm56
@AndrewMueller execs will buy something they feel is contained. let it prove itself. then they'll let you tear down the fences #sm56
@AndrewMueller I just disagree that we should b in boardrooms "selling" SM. Sell something specific, not generic #sm56
@andrewmueller u've known me long enuff to know I'm a "prove it" guy. I love ROI and justification. #sm56
@andrewmueller well, you could say it, but I wouldn't advise it :) #sm56
@andrewmueller How so? The word "media" is in there for a reason. U can't say "I'm going to do social media today" #sm56
@MrAkashsharma disagree, SM is not a strategy. Unless TV, Newsprint, etc. are also strategies #sm56
@andrewmueller we don't pitch execs on the ROI of paper, we pitch them on what we wrote on it #sm56
@andrewmueller I agree, but think ur missing my point. y are we pitching channels vs. campaigns/activities/etc? #sm56
@correlationist why not pitch SM to exec same as peripheral sales activity? Do you measure ROI of taking client to dinner? #sm56
@correlationist because ROI is a *post* activity metric. If they haven't bought in yet how are you demonstrating it #sm56
@treypennington I'll quote my new hero @jaybaer again "Learn how to BE social, not DO social" #sm56
@treypennington Q3: Sell more stuff :P #sm56
@treypennington Q3: Sell more stuff :P #sm56
@AndrewMueller I say no, however it could contribute to a change in mindset at top which leads to that #sm56
@AndrewMueller obviously genericizing here but IMO they are still vacuums within a broader org. #sm56
@sepler in the cases i know of they were specific silos who took it on themselves to utilize sm for their needs, not an integrated obj #sm56
@sepler in the cases i know of they were specific silos who took it on themselves to utilize sm for their needs, not an integrated obj #sm56
@sepler in the cases i know of they were specific silos who took it on themselves to utilize sm for their needs, not an integrated obj #sm56
@correlationist I would argue it's bc so many of us overcomplicate it vs. simplifying SM as just another channel #sm56
@treypennington All examples I know of "grassroots" success (comcast, etc.) only occurred in a silo'd execution, not companywide #sm56
@treypennington chicken and egg. either can initiate the other #sm56
@treypennington there are many objectives requiring many approaches to SM. (sales, mktg,cs, etc.) u cannot simply push "SM" #sm56
@steve_campbell to quote @jaybaer , it also "allows big companies to act small". Just as important a cultural shift IMO #sm56
@CoryOBrien If I as CEO choose to turn my back on your POV, my underlings will either follow suit or they will leave. #SM56
@CoryOBrien have to agree 2 disagree. passionate employees thrive in the right one and die in the wrong one, but they don't create it #SM56
@CoryOBrien Culture is top down. SM success depends on corp culture. Empowerment of the passionate (vs. title) is key #SM56
@Marc_Meyer arggh, can't believe I missed #Sm54 . Was one of my fave topics.
@sharonmostyn the notion of someone "feigning interest" goes against authenticity to me, but obviously others see emotional benefit #sm52
@sharonmostyn I've heard that a couple times today. It's not that I don't believe you. I just don't get it #sm52
@jasonbreed @marc_meyers I assume the tool to auto-follow everyone who participated is working? you want to provide link? #sm52
@jasonbreed @tamar @marc_meyer many thanks #sm52
@sharonmostyn as a brand i care about what you think about *me*, not what your two old just swallowed #sm52
@sharonmostyn not following doesn't stop engagement, i'm at loss as to why it matters to be honest #sm52
@sharonmostyn it basically implies "remove all comm. filtering". sounds great in theory, doesn't work in practice #sm52
@sharonmostyn a point i disagree with as you can tell though :) #sm52
@karimacatherine virtually all customer service comm. utilize DM (address, accounts, phone #, etc.) #sm52
@karimacatherine if i follow everyone, they can DM me (in volume), that can be a detriment to those needing private engagement #sm52
@Marc_Meyer in their case perhaps they were *too* authentic :) #nestle #sm52
@karimacatherine for a "logic" argument, how about a brand wanting to save DM for actual issues vs. dialog? #sm52
@notifyneal exactly #sm52
@jasonbreed ur spot on with Q3 I think, social media can expose traditional comm. for snake oil if not authentic #sm52
@karimacatherine :P #sm52
@notifyneal again, I'm not talking about what companies *want* to do, only what is sometimes impractical #sm52
@karimacatherine dont understand how some automated follow provides you that comfort #sm52
@momof3boys3702 only talking about scale here, if you have 100 social followers a day who want to talk, go for it #sm52
@momof3boys3702 and you and a million others are their best customers, but many times cannot afford to simply "engage" #sm52
@jasonbreed Q3: Be authentic in everything you do. Done #sm52
@momof3boys3702 there is not unlimited time at a company, you must triage your dollars #sm52
@momof3boys3702 would you prefer they spend their time making u feel good or improving product/service? #sm52
@karimacatherine prob is, if brand autofollows then they obviously cannot monitor followers due to volume. whatdoes that accomplish? #sm52
@tamar: RT @Marc_Meyer: Why do you want a brand to follow you back? #sm52 - i wonder the same. - and I
@momof3boys3702 how is following you customer service or caring? #sm52
@tamar 64% of followers/friends/fans more likely to purchase from that brand. also a meaningless statistic #sm52
@Kevin_DeSoto With a million followers how do I engage and interact with u personally? #sm52
@jasonbreed I think the "level of brand advocacy" goes in exactly that order. Twitter=meh, Facebook=brand user, Blog=Disciple #sm52
@jasonbreed I think the "level of brand advocacy" goes in exactly that order. Twitter=meh, Facebook=brand user, Blog=Disciple #sm52
@karimacatherine To be fair, @Umatter2Charter is assisting me right now, and has multiple times. Great guy, great service #sm52
@jasonbreed In the end, Authenticity trumps all #sm52
@Marc_Meyer e.g. "Joe Schmo's statements were not reflective of those of our company" Disavowment can be useful #sm52
@Marc_Meyer I'd also argue however that personalization does mitigate some risks as well #sm52
@TomMartin I would argue that as "social business" volume increases personalities must decrease by proxy #sm52
@karimacatherine You can only scale "tone of voice", "personalities" are 1 of the risk mitigation challenges facing corporations #sm52
@TomMartin If Mustang fan would you rather follow "Ford" or follow "lead designer of mustang"? Large enterprises need segmentation #sm52
@johncass so one day we have these docs published google wave style and you can see all edits/editors? :) #sm51
RT @Marc_Meyer: @techguerilla @johncass We have a new feature which allows u follow those who participated today http://bit.ly/9xd8SD #sm51
@andrewmueller do i need to disclose that I'm doing your blastfollow job for you? :P #sm51
@johncass as always you can follow everyone who participated by going to blastfollow.com and using hashtag #sm51
@karimacatherine technically, not a ghostwriter, but you can see how it's misleading #sm51 http://twitpic.com/18yqyf
@johncass Many thx @johncass et al , always stimulating #sm51
@karimacatherine Like buying a book with "ROBERT LUDLUM" in huge letters, and ghostwriters name in small font :) #sm51
@karimacatherine The Q is whether or not what you are tweeting requires trust. As that increases so does disclosure need #sm51
@andrewmueller If I tweet under @Fortune500_Broadcast I may be 40 individuals, how is that personalized? #sm51
@andrewmueller If I tweet under @Fortune500_Broadcast I may be 40 individuals, how is that personalized? #sm51
@sandraproulx I'd never hang my hat publicly on a specific agency, they work on my behalf, not vice versa #sm51
@johncass if it is a "corp. broadcast" I see no need, but seems more the realm of pr spin than social media to me #sm51
@andrewmueller however, if depersonalized to that degree it's arguably not "social" media #sm51
@andrewmueller however, if depersonalized to that degree it's arguably not "social" media #sm51
@AndrewMueller I view agencies/consultants as a proxy to the brand, if published as a company stance vs. individual I say fine #sm51
@johncass this expectation of bias is really what drives the independent research industry (forrester, et al) #sm51
@andrewmueller I'd argue that if you know the source, it doesn't matter to you. If you find out later, then trust may be lost #sm51
@techguerilla One of the more engaging convo's I've had. Much appreciated Frank, et al. #sm50
@karimacatherine I aim to please :P . Now if I just had some of those cool super powers like Hiro #sm50
@nigellegg Key is for C level execs to get comfy with empowering what will likely be lower level SM hero #sm50
@comcastcares As always, you can go to blastfollow.com and put in hashtag #sm50 to follow everyone who participated today
@comcastcares Bottom line, hire people who *want* to help solve problems. From wherever they may currently reside #SM50
@comcastcares Yet Social CS reps need understanding of brand as well..including the brands tone of voice, values, etc #SM50
@dariasteigman my point was simply, if you are not going to be the leader, at least be a smart follower #sm50
@comcastcares Q3: Another simple method is have them monitor @comcastcares for a while :) #SM50
RT @nigellegg: A whole lot of corporate social media seems to me to be about breaking silos between depts. & btwn Co & Customers. #sm50
@comcastcares Q3: Educate, educate, educate #SM50 #SocialMedia
@comcastcares But you're implying that someone screwing up in SM represents same impact as someone screwing up on phone. Gobsmacked #sm50
@comcastcares The risk of a poor hiring choice for SM role, is many factors greater than traditional #SM50
@comcastcares Same? I'll have to *strongly* disagree. 1 can be dealt with behind closed doors, the other cannot #SM50
@comcastcares Ok, here is example of risk. Social CS rep says "F You" to customer. Was now said to millions, not just 1 person #SM50
@comcastcares no, I meant example of how we might "relook at how we do servcice" to deal with scale issues #SM50 #SM50
@comcastcares I do as well, but passion and social finesse are 2 diff things #SM50
@comcastcares Inevitably you must deal with mitigating the risks of Social CS #SM50
@comcastcares example? #SM50
@comcastcares do you really believe there are hundreds of you at comcast who can do what you do from your existing CS staff #SM50
@comcastcares you can reduce quality, and go to more scripted environment to protect against risks..but then value is lost #SM50
@comcastcares Those staff are more educated, cost more, take more time per issue, and overseas isn't capable #SM50 #Socialmedia
@comcastcares To be blunt, the 'finesse' taking place at current low volume of Social CS is beyond financial payback to staff #sm50
@comcastcares I don't think it does scale at the quality level we are currently seeing. It can't. #SM50 #Socialmedia
@Tbeffs So if eastern seaboard has power outage then customer service should manage communications? I disagree #sm50
@comcastcares Let's face it, the time of "scripted" Customer Service has passed #sm50
@socialtality In @comcastcares world for example, 100,000 customer outage is different social challenge than 1:1 #sm50
@comcastcares Also a need for social "issue" segmentation. 1:1 issues are customer service, mass issues are PR #SM50
@comcastcares Many companies have implemented CCO #SM50
@comcastcares At its core CS is a delivery mechanism for your Brand Values #sm50
@Marc_Meyer As always, go to blastfollow.com and put in hashtag #sm49 to automatically follow todays participants
@gregverdino @jasonbreed @marc_meyer Thanks all! #sm49
@CraigElimeliah trust me, it's a great analogy for the non-entrenched, non-geek, normal people out there #sm49
@CraigElimeliah: Look at Twitter like radio, Facebook like print and YouTube like TV - #sm49 {Love that analogy}
@themaria nobody puts baby in a corner! #sm49
@sharonmostyn Of course, it's extremely possible that the next big thing is that old thing #sm49
@gregverdino Yes, I think the traditional gets sold short, as redirected energies towards NBT cannot be assigned value yet #sm49
@gregverdino we have to be the thought leaders. and your client *will* ask you about your thoughts on that S.O. #sm49
@gregverdino "are we outpacing consumers?" - I hope so. Preparedness is next to godliness #sm49
@gregverdino We *are* the client. it's our *job* to stay on top of possibilities 4 them. That's paid IMO, just at experimental scale #sm49
@gregverdino We *are* the client. it's our *job* to stay on top of possibilities 4 them. That's paid IMO, just at experimental scale #sm49
@gregverdino When it comes to shiny objects. Fail small before winning big. #sm49
@gregverdino When it comes to shiny objects. Fail small before winning big. #sm49
@marketwire Again, why do we think that NBT would look anything like social media terms of measurement? #sm49
@kenburbary Catch-22 in ur statement, without hype you cannot implement, no implementation no value proof #sm49
@gregverdino Q2: Partially this is driven by the type of marketer you are. Some live on edge as part of their brand #sm49
@CoryOBrien Geoffrey Moore couldn't have put it better :) #SM49
@gregverdino NBT is rarely metrics driven initially. #sm49
@gregverdino Context is key. Are you a thought leader and can position NBT in relation to other options? Or use bc it's there? #sm49
@gregverdino I think the key is whether you constantly monitor and learn, or try and execute too early in the cycle #sm49
@AndrewMueller doesn't hurt that i was both a vc and a marketer, so obvious where my mentality comes from #sm49
@gregverdino Sure many will fail, but if those that succeed overcome those losses then it's a good investment right? #sm49
@gregverdino I view marketers similar to venture capitalists in this respect. #sm49
@jsandford And remember to flush or @gregverdino will have something to say about it... #sm49
@kenburbary Note that you can go to blastfollow.com , put in this hashtag and follow all the participants at once. #sm48
@kenburbary Note that you can go to blastfollow.com , put in this hashtag and follow all the participants at once. #sm48
@CoryOBrien @karimacatherine And with that soundbite I think my work here is done :P . Have a great day! #sm48
@coryobrien Kind of like sending out a survey to find out what percentage of people will not respond to surveys. #sm48
@CoryOBrien because many times it's what is *not* in the data that matters. #sm48
@themaria @coryobrien and we pray that day never comes #sm48 #skynet
@CoryOBrien mainly comes into play when trying to interpret results of one platform vs. another #sm48
@kenburbary Much thanks to @kenburbary, and @marc_meyer and @jasonbreed for facilitating #sm48
@themaria my issue is with weighting, not prioritization #sm48
@kenburbary the work we do in the area is high-touch, & tightly focused, so bulk of time is spent in initial collection filter #sm48
@kenburbary There's a vanishing point of returns in there somewhere, I'm frankly not sure where it is #sm48
@kenburbary at what point does segmentation run into the "NSA Overload" issue of too much data? (is there such a thing?) #sm48
@kenburbary 10 yrs ago the "channel" was simply called "internet", was also too broad and undefined much like SM #sm48
@kenburbary We'll have to disagree on twitter as a channel. I can't reasonably rollup SM as a whole into a channel. Too varied #sm48
@kenburbary The channel itself already presupposes a certain skew of segmentation #sm48
@kenburbary You must decide what to collect before you can segment, that initial criteria of the pool is critical based on objectives #sm48
@kenburbary What's interesting is many times in SM you get the secondary info first, and traditional segmentation after #sm48
@kenburbary What's interesting is many times in SM you get the secondary info first, and traditional segmentation after #sm48
@kdpaine Kudos for the mind provocation, and to @marc_meyer @jasconbreed for hosting #SM47
@kdpaine I suppose the argument would be, better company, better sentiment? Any feel for ROI vs. capturing competitors customers? #SM47
@kdpaine I tend not to measure positive of a competitor. What actionable info are you deriving? Perhaps I should rethink #SM47
@kdpaine would seem a very ripe area for artificial intelligence to play a long term role #sm47
@RepuTrack the prob with forum comment tracking is assigning a weight value. there is not enough volume to context ratio #sm47
@kdpaine How do you approach "reactive" measurement, vs. "proactive" measurement? one has specific goal #sm47
@kdpaine How do you approach "reactive" measurement, vs. "proactive" measurement? one has specific goal #sm47
@Marc_Meyer wouldn't frequency encompass velocity? #sm47
@correlationist you can safely ignore surrounding elements in certain cases, most analysis not so lucky though #sm47
@correlationist you can safely ignore surrounding elements in certain cases, most analysis not so lucky though #sm47
@JoeKikta you find polarizing elements to collect. "microsoft" and "blue screen" is overwhelmingly a negative statement #sm47
@JoeKikta you find polarizing elements to collect. "microsoft" and "blue screen" is overwhelmingly a negative statement #sm47
@jasonbreed I see process as automated collection, and human filtering/analysis. That can scale relatively well #sm47
@jasonbreed same as analytics, broad swaths of "information" gleaned from collection. but "knowledge" comes from a human #sm47
@jasonbreed I wouldn't generically say "automated doesn't work", just that it has specific limitations #sm47
@kdpaine I would think one of the more important aspects of sentiment analysis is establishing a solid baseline #Sm47
@kdpaine How would account for sarcasm in an automated environment? #Sm47
@shelisrael are you trying to tell me something? ;) "..and often politely ignore your inanities" #sm44
@aneclecticsoul Can you hear me now? :) #SM44
@andrewmueller Yo Andrew, where is your weekly link to @blastfollow ? Falling down on your job my man #SM44
U 2! RT @elhoust: Gr8 #sm44 chat: @Shanan_S @chrissfife @SuperDu @mollask @MichaelWillett @bdresher @zack_hanebrink @nigellegg @techguerilla
@NigelFenwick Your point is taken. I was referring to the fact that the source of a tweet or RT affects impact of content #SM44
@jasonbreed so, like me twitter is a tool. like me, it can be both a waste of time or useful. in summary, I am twitter #sm44
@shelisrael There is a twitter "free market". Regardless of that markets choices, leave govt out #sm44
@shelisrael your voice is enhanced/denigrated by source of retweet, not same perception as horses mouth #sm44
@shelisrael your voice is enhanced/denigrated by source of retweet, not same perception as horses mouth #sm44
@wvpmc you can only target to listen, you cannot target to speak #sm44
@wvpmc you can only target to listen, you cannot target to speak #sm44
@wvpmc but by its very nature it is 1:1 relationship. You don't follow, you don't hear. Thus opt-in by default #sm44
@shelisrael I think too many people try to put twitter in single bucket. "Nobody puts baby in a corner." #sm44
@CraigKessler I would argue that "wasted time" includes time that could have been better spent #sm44
@Marc_Meyer I suppose at some point B2B could source new suppliers and product availability #sm44
@Marc_Meyer I suppose at some point B2B could source new suppliers and product availability #sm44
@shelisrael Some of my clients, and thus me, are struggling with level of internal penetration and control #sm44
@shelisrael Another + of course is that I can select a remote pool of non-competetive experts to share with that I wouldn't locally #sm44
@shelisrael Many examples, as diverse as local sm "clubs" to specific people I bounce ideas off of like @davegray #sm44
@shelisrael Many examples, as diverse as local sm "clubs" to specific people I bounce ideas off of like @davegray #sm44
@shelisrael Q1: Dramatically expanded my pool of available expertise. A major bonus for a consultancy #sm44
@CoryOBrien I see my clients as my best salespeople. If they've paved the road, it's going to be a smooth road indeed #SM43
@CoryOBrien I see my clients as my best salespeople. If they've paved the road, it's going to be a smooth road indeed #SM43
@CoryOBrien I find comfort in metrics due to my DM background, but typically they are products of evolution, not revolution #SM43
@CoryOBrien Clients will always be more comfortable with hard metrics, but big picture creative strategies are rarely driven by them #SM43
@CoryOBrien "prove" is a sticky word, but I take ur point. I suppose I'd define "success" as a client recommendation in this instance #SM43
@CoryOBrien SM can b more similar 2 advertising vs. marketing when it comes to defining its value (i.e. no measurable call to action) #SM43
@CoryOBrien Definitely on case studies, however ROI (or metric measurements thereof) is a debatable vendor filter for many strategies. #SM43
@CoryOBrien I was specifically referencing "proven success", not experience. I see the 2 differently #SM43
@CoryOBrien I was specifically referencing "proven success", not experience. I see the 2 differently #SM43
@shelisrael re: Q - Would love 2 C discussion on defining SM (from a biz angle). Twit/FB/YT/Etc really in same leverageable bucket? #sm43
@maggiefox BTW: Was awesome to see an actual takeaway asset (RFP Template) #sm43
@maggiefox Great chat Maggie! #sm43
@maggiefox Great chat Maggie! #sm43
@maggiefox First Q is whether they want someone to "execute" their strategy, or someone to "create" their strategy. Diff vendors #sm43
@maggiefox Whichever aligns best with your execution strategy. Are you "bolting on" to marketing? Then broader viewpoint likely best #sm43
@maggiefox After filtering, ability to do due diligence and detect the "wizard behind the curtain" is a must. #sm43
@socialtality Sure. You want names or general "type"? #sm43
@Marc_Meyer An independent can educate you internally, develop rfp on your behalf, and narrow the field to only good choices #sm43
@maggiefox Q2: I'd recommend outsourcing the actual vendor discovery & selection process in many cases to an independent #sm43
@maggiefox Experience is diff than proven success #sm43
@CoryOBrien Finding proven vendors in the SM space is a self-limiting exercise in something so emergent #SM43
@maggiefox An issue is that the variants of SM can require vastly diff strategies, using generic SM moniker is difficult #sm43
@maggiefox An issue is that the variants of SM can require vastly diff strategies, using generic SM moniker is difficult #sm43
@Marc_Meyer always interesting discussion. also thx to @mmorri @minxmoggy @nigellegg @sharonmostyn @kriscolvin @ajmunn @elhoust #sm42
@Marc_Meyer always interesting discussion. also thx to @mmorri @minxmoggy @nigellegg @sharonmostyn @kriscolvin @ajmunn @elhoust #sm42
@nigellegg this of course assumes that SM is efficient and scalable (relative to other platforms) #sm42
@KrisColvin what they *should* do and what 90% of execs *actually* do are 2 diff things :) #sm42
@KrisColvin Systematic integration can be helpful, but most executions I've seen "de-socialize" SM and benefit corp more than cust. #sm42
@KrisColvin Q3 - Education, Exposure, Examples, Execution (and Explicit controls) #sm42
RT @socialtality: @comcastcares - engagement begins where need, customer, and company intersect #sm42
@KrisColvin Disagree, many times providing no info is better than providing wrong info to customer #sm42
@KrisColvin Disagree, many times providing no info is better than providing wrong info to customer #sm42
@KrisColvin I agree that twitter can be a "platform", not sure I'd call that activity SM though. what's social about automation? #sm42
@KrisColvin True, but you *do* have to listen to understand how SM interactions work, preferably before you dive in #sm42
@KrisColvin Q2: First, you listen. Second, you listen some more #sm42
@KrisColvin Q2: First, you listen. Second, you listen some more #sm42
@KrisColvin Some businesses are better suited to "pushing" info via social, but all biz can leverage the "pull" of info #sm42
@wolfrage Both a good statement and a good plug :) #sm41
@drnatalie Am I the only one who feels sad that we are basically still talking about Geoffrey Moore's concepts in the 90's? #sm41
@mjayliebs SM could support prod. dev., just not sure how traditional prod dev differs much from what you're describing #sm41
RT @KathyHerrmann: re: blastfollow.com Now if I someone would just put those into a "list"... :) #sm41
@mjayliebs Wouldn't that effectively just be "product development" (or service) #sm41
@wolfrage Basically, we guess/theorize. Then we test. Tweak failures and add new ideas from feedback. Rinse and repeat. #sm41
@wolfrage Basically, we guess/theorize. Then we test. Tweak failures and add new ideas from feedback. Rinse and repeat. #sm41
Exactly. *empowered* customer advocates RT @chriswidner: Companies should view customer service as customer advocates instead. #sm41
@ericfletcher Much of SM "CS" should be a part of marketing IMO #sm41
@ericfletcher Much of SM "CS" should be a part of marketing IMO #sm41
@TobyDiva Your water hose seems to be pumping water just fine :) #sm41
@TobyDiva Your water hose seems to be pumping water just fine :) #sm41
@TobyDiva sometimes you can also do the "right" thing badly (AT&T + Adam Savage) #sm41
@jsandford The question is what do you want to measure? *Company* success or *CS* success. 1 begats the other, but measured diff. #sm41
@kikscore That may measure product/company performance, but it doesn't measure CS #SM41
@kikscore That may measure product/company performance, but it doesn't measure CS #SM41
@drnatalie They work just fine, they just don't acheive a proper objective :) #SM41
@comcastcares Q3: Diff measurements for diff objectives. SM crosses all traditional departmental boundaries. #SM41
@TobyDiva Differences in SM? Imagine outsourcing your SM efforts overseas and they'll leap out at you. #sm41
@TobyDiva Differences in SM? Imagine outsourcing your SM efforts overseas and they'll leap out at you. #sm41
@shashib Q3: It's definitely not measured in "time per call" :) #sm41
@shashib Q3: It's definitely not measured in "time per call" :) #sm41
@TobyDiva well said #sm41
@TobyDiva well said #sm41
@Marc_Meyer Unfortunately all of those skills cost money and time. Where do you pull from your margins to obtain them? #sm41
@Marc_Meyer Brand cognizance, impact awareness, ease of misunderstanding context online, etc, etc all require experience and training #sm41
@Marc_Meyer I like the idea of it as well. It's the reality of it that terrifies me :) #sm41
@smurdoff Yet indexing a twitter conversation to find future answers is virtually useless #SM41
@andrewmueller they are opportunities. for both great good, and great disaster. point is the same #sm41
@shashib Q2 I think the experiences with live chat are a good example of the bad/good with attempting to scale existing personnel #sm41
@shashib Q2 I think the experiences with live chat are a good example of the bad/good with attempting to scale existing personnel #sm41
@andrewmueller I'd argue that you want someone different handling a customer complaint live in front of thousands vs. individually #sm41
@andrewmueller I'd argue that you want someone different handling a customer complaint live in front of thousands vs. individually #sm41
@Marc_Meyer No, the very nature of SM requires a more deft and "aware" interaction #sm41
@comcastcares there's "fair" and there's "right". what's right for the brand may not be "fair" #sm41
@comcastcares there's "fair" and there's "right". what's right for the brand may not be "fair" #sm41
@eamcc A challenge is that the level of "brand intelligence" required in these interactions is exponentially higher #sm41
@eamcc One could argue tht twitter can change role of CS to more direct brand support via "search and address" proactively #sm41
@eamcc One could argue tht twitter can change role of CS to more direct brand support via "search and address" proactively #sm41
@shashib Q1: Yes, but CS is typically a "reactive" function so certain SM mediums better than others #sm41 #socialmedia
@shashib Q1: Yes, but CS is typically a "reactive" function so certain SM mediums better than others #sm41 #socialmedia
@shashib Do we have a working def. of type of SM tools for this discussion? (twitter vs. youtube for example) #sm41 #socialmedia